The Role of Dissenting Opinions in Constitutional Court Judgements: Perspectives of Judges and Legal Interpretation

Peran Dissenting Opinion dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perspektif Hakim dan Penafsiran Hukum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2138

Keywords:

Dissenting Opinion, Judicial Review, Legal Politics, Legal Truth

Abstract


The dissenting opinion of Constitutional Court judges in conducting judicial reviews of laws against the 1945 Constitution represents the freedom of Constitutional Court judges. These dissenting opinions are essentially aimed at seeking legal truth. This research addresses two main issues: First, the legal politics behind the occurrence of dissenting opinions by Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution. Second, the methods of legal interpretation used by Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution. This study uses normative legal methods, with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings of this research are as follows: First, the provisions of Article 24, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution provide the constitutional basis for the dissenting opinions of Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution. Second, Constitutional Court judges are not restricted nor bound by any single method of legal interpretation. The use of legal interpretation methods by Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution is their prerogative, as, in principle, the use of such methods is aimed at seeking legal truth.

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2011.

Dewi, Niluh Kadek Rai Suya, dan I Dewa Made Suartha. “Nilai-Nilai Positif dan Akibat Hukum Dissenting Opinion dalam Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 5 (2015): 1–15. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/20540.

Dhiksita, Ida Bagus Gede Putra Agung, dkk. “Politik Hukum dan Quo Vadis Pembentukan Undang-Undang dengan Metode Omnibus Law di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 19, no. 2 (2022): 166–84. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i2.878.

Firdaus, Sunny Ummul, dkk. “Peran Dissenting Opinion Hakim Konstitusi dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 197–211. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.197-211.

Fudika, Moza Dela, dkk. “Konfigurasi Politik Lahirnya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 19, no. 2 (2022): 185–97. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i2.881.

Harefa, Beniharmoni. “Kebenaran Hukum Perspektif Filsafat Hukum.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2016): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v2i1.7277.

Indera, Mexsasai, dkk. “Kekuatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (2023): 295–326. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2027.

Jurdi, Fajrurrahman, dan Ahmad Yani. “Legitimasi Perubahan Konstitusi Non-Formal dan Pembatasannya dalam Paham Konstitusionalisme.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (2023): 253–74. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2026.

Khalid, Afif. “Penafsiran Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia.” Al-‘Adl 6, no. 11 (2014): 11–22. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/225122-penafsiran-hukum-oleh-hakim-dalam-sistem-f0c52582.pdf.

Khoifah, Ayu. “Pembenahan Muatan Kebijakan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Melalui Policy Screening Tool.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 19, no. 2 (2022): 148–64. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i2.837.

Kurnia, Titon Slamet. Interpretasi Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2015.

Mahfud MD, Moh. Membangun Politik Hukum Menegakkan Konstitusi. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2011.

Mahfud MD, Moh. Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi. Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2013.

Manan, Bagir. Teori dan Politik Konstitusi. Cetakan Kedua. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2004.

Manan, Bagir, dan Kuntana Magnar. Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Alumni, 1997.

Manullang, Ferdinand M. Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan: Tinjauan Hukum Kodrat dan Antinomi Nilai. Jakarta: Buku Kompas, 2007.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Cetakan Keempat. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2008.

Prajatama, Hangga. “Kedudukan Dissenting Opinion sebagai Upaya Kebebasan Hakim untuk Mencari Keadilan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Verstek 2, no. 1 (2014): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.20961/verstek.v2i1.38837.

Prayogo, R. Tony. “Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Hak Uji Materiil dan dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/PMK/2005 tentang Pedoman Beracara dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 13, no. 2 (2016): 191–201. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/151.

Rasjidi, Lili, dan Ira Thania Rasjidi. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.

Riyanto, Slamet, dkk. “Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Nilai dan Formulasinya dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 20, no. 2 (2023): 1–13. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/993.

Sanusi, Uci, dan Miftah Faried Hadinatha. “Menghidupkan Norma Inkonstitusional dalam Undang-Undang: Suatu Analisis Prinsip Checks and Balances.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (2023): 301–26. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2028.

Sumodiningrat, Aprilian. “Penguatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Politik Hukum Legislasi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 2 (2023): 227–52. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2025.

Sunarmi. “Dissenting Opinion sebagai Wujud Transparansi dalam Putusan Peradilan.” Jurnal Equality 12, no. 2 (2007): 140–49.

Wadji, Farid, dan Suhrawardi K. Lubis. Etika Profesi Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Wiyanto, Andy. “Pertanggungjawaban Presiden dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (2010): 203–28. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk738.

Zaman, Nurus. Konstitusi dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Nusantara, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-01

How to Cite

Zaman, Nurus. 2024. “The Role of Dissenting Opinions in Constitutional Court Judgements: Perspectives of Judges and Legal Interpretation: Peran Dissenting Opinion Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perspektif Hakim Dan Penafsiran Hukum”. Jurnal Konstitusi 21 (3):482-500. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2138.

Issue

Section

Articles