The Paradox of State of Law Idea on Pancasila Philosophical Justification as Source of Law

Paradoks Ide Negara Hukum dalam Justifikasi Filosofis Pancasila sebagai Sumber Hukum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2114

Keywords:

State of Law Idea, Paradox, Pancasila, Constitutional Adjudication, Source of Law

Abstract


The state of law idea formulated in the provisions of Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is a formulation containing normative statements that is still dubious and seems convincing. The Pancasila philosophical justification as the source of legal norms needs to be questioned. The possibility if Pancasila is used as the source of law will expand coercive actions and choices of legal imperatives. The research method used is analytical techniques with a critical-philosophical approach, which brings factual concepts closer by resting on philosophical issues within the scope of concepts and values for understanding Pancasila which is still interpreted as the source of all sources of law. The research findings found that the construction of the state of law idea should not depend on legal rigidity. It must be able to be created as a discursive space that is truly interpretive and not limitative. The paradox’s problem can be raised through legal interpretations which are able to find a relationship between what should be normative and what is factual.

Author Biography

Artha Debora Silalahi, Faculty of Philosophy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Artha Debora Silalahi, is the doctoral student of the doctoral philosophy program concerned at West Philosophy in the Faculty of Philosophy Universitas Gadjah Mada started 2023 until now. She graduated from Bachelor of Law Program in Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia in 2019 and she obtained her Master Degree from Postgraduate Program in Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia in 2021. She wrote her thesis during her study period in Bachelor of Law and Master of Law Program focused in Constitution and Constitutional Law. She is concerned that research areas in the field of law study are constitutional law, democracy, human rights, and social equality. She is also interested in philosophy studies such as philosophy of law, philosophy of politics, philosophy of science, and ethica. She had numerous experiences during her internship periods as researcher assistant in a variety of research fields in Civil Society Organization such as Law, Democracy, and Human Rights. She even joined the student organizations during her studies in the Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia focused on the Research and Organization Development area.

References

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia (Jakarta: KonPress, 2005).

Bo’a, Fais Yonas. “Pancasila sebagai Sumber Segala Sumber Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 1 (Maret 2018): 27-49. https://doi.org/10.31078/ jk1512.

Chia, Phillip Suciadi. “Pancasila and Covenantal Pluralism in Indonesia: A Historical Approach.” Transformation 39, no. 2 (2022): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788211069971.

Darmaputera, Eka. Pancasila Identitas dan Modernitas: Tinjauan Etis dan Budaya. Jakarta: PT. BPK Gunung Mulia, 1987.

Departemen Penerangan RI. Pantjasila sebagai Dasar Negara (Kursus-Kursus Presiden Sukarno tentang Pantja Sila di Istana Negara di Djakarta tgl.26 Mei s.d. 5 Djuni, 16 Djuni dan 22 Djuli dan 3 September 1958, dan Kuliah Umum pada Seminar Pantja Sila di Jogjakarta tg. 21 Pebruari 1959). Jogjakarta: Yayasan Prapantja, 1959.

Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. “Quo Vadis Pancasila Sebagai Norma Konstitusi Yang Tidak Dapat Diubah.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (September 20019): 585-605. https://doi. org/10.31078/jk1637.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Filsafat Fragmentaris: Deskripsi, Kritik dan Dekonstruksi. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 2006.

Hardiman, F. Budi. Kebenaran dan Para Kritikusnya: Mengulik Idea Besar yang Memandu Zaman Kita. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 2023.

Hatta, Moh. et al. Uraian Pancasila. Jakarta: Mutiara Jakarta, 1984.

Huijbers, Theo. Filsafat Hukum. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 1990.

Nugraha, Ignatius Yordan. “Abusive Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: Indonesia, the Pancasila and the Spectre of Authoritarianism.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 43, no. 2 (Summer 2023): 379–404. https://doi.org/2075/10.1093/ojls/gqad002.

Isra, Saldi. Sistem Rekrutmen dan Pengangkatan Hakim Agung dan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Konsepsi Negara Hukum. Jakarta: BPHN, 2015.

Kartohadiprodjo, Soediman. Beberapa Pikiran Sekitar Pantja-Sila. Bandung: Alumni, 1969.

Künkler, M., & Sezgin, Y. “The Unification of Law and the Postcolonial State: The Limits of State Monism in India and Indonesia.” American Behavioral Scientist 60, no. 8 (2016): 987–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216643808.

Kusuma, A.B. Lahirnya Undang-Undang Dasar 1945: Menurut Salinan Dokumen Oetentik Badan Oentoek Menjelidiki Oesaha-Oesaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum UI, 2004.

Latif, Yudi. Negara Paripurna: Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualitas Pancasila. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2015.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan: Tinjauan Hukum Kodrat dan Antinomi Nilai. Jakarta: PT Kompas, 2007.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. M. Korporatisme dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. Legisme, Legalitas, dan Kepastian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Group, 2016.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. “Mempertanyakan Pancasila sebagai Grundnorm: Refleksi Kritis dalam Perspektif Fondasionalisme.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 50, no. 2 (2020): 284-301. http:// dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no2.2584.

Manullang, E. Fernando M. “Kritik terhadap Struktur Ilmu Hukum Menurut Paul Scholten.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 49, no. 1 (2019): 44-56. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol49/iss1/2.

Marbun, S.F. “Negara Hukum dan Kekuasaan.” Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 4, no. 9 (1997): 9-19. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/6931.

Muslih, and Risti Aulia Ulfah. “Urgensi Karakteristik Warganegara Demokratis pada Abad ke Dua Puluh Satu.” Citizenship: Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 2 (2019): 125-138. http://doi.org/10.25273/citizenship.v7i2.5923.

Notonagoro. Pancasila Dasar Falsafah Negara. Yogyakarta: CV Pandjuran Tudjuh, 1974.

Notonagoro. Pancasila Secara Ilmiah Populer. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1987.

Nugroho, Andre Setyo. “Pancasila as a Source of Law in Enforcing Corruption in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism 2, no. 1 (2023): 103-38. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijpgc.v2i1.59806.

Pradhani, Sartika Intaning. “Konsepsi Manusia Indonesia dalam Perspektif Ideologi Hukum Indonesia.” Mimbar Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 30, no. 1 (2018): 50-61. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.29781.

Prawiranegara, Sjafruddin. “Pancasila as the Sole Foundation.” Indonesia, no. 38 (1984): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350846.

Pristiwiyanto. “Pancasila dalam Kajian Filsafat: Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi.” Fatawa: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 1, no. 2 (2021): 253-262. https://doi.org/10.37812/ fatawa.v1i2.448.

Pound, Roscoe. Jurisprudence 1. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, 2000.

Sagama, Suwardi. “Analisis Konsep Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum dan Kemanfaatan dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan.” Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam XV, no. 1 (Juni 2016): 20-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/mj.v15i1.590/.

Sastrapratedja, M. Pancasila sebagai Visi dan Referensi Kritik Sosial. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2001.

Soekarno. Risalah Sidang BPUPKI-PPKI Tahun 1945: Pidato Soekarno 1 Juni 1945, pidato disampaikan pada Sidang I BPUPKI tertanggal 1 Juni 1945.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni, 1980.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT Alumni, 1982.

Sudiarja SJ, A. et al. Karya Lengkap Driyarkara: Esai-Esai Filsafat Pemikir yang terlibat Penuh dalam Perjuangan Bangsanya. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia, 2006.

Sudjito. Bernegara Hukum Tanpa Budaya Malu. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2017.

Sunoto. Mengenai Filsafat Pancasila: Filsafat Sosial dan Politik Pancasila Seri Keempat. Andi Offset Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 1985.

Sunoto. Mengenal Filsafat Pancasila: Pendekatan melalui Metafisika, Logika dan Etika Seri Pertama. Yogyakarta: PT Hanindita Offset, 1981.

Suseno, Franz Magnis. Kuasa dan Moral. Jakarta: PT Gramedia, 1995.

Suseno, Franz Magnis. Etika Politik: Prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Jakarta: PT Gramedia, 1987.

Suyahmo. “Filsafat Dialektika Hegel: Relevansinya dengan Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Humaniora 19, no. 2 (Juni 2007): 143-150. https://doi.org/10.22146/ jh.v19i2.898.

Spencer, Phillip and Howad Wollman. Nations and Nationalism A Reader. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2005.

Umarhadi, Yoseph. Hakikat Manusia Pancasila Menurut Notonagoro dan Drijarkara: Aktualisasinya bagi Demokrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 2022.

Universitas Gadjah Mada. Prof Notonagoro dan Pancasila: Analisis Tekstual and Kontekstual. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada Press, 2006.

Wacks, Raymond. Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Wacks, Raymond. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory Third Edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.

Wantu, Fence M. “Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim.” Mimbar Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 19, no. 3 (2007): 387-398. https://doi.org/10.22146/ jmh.19070.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

How to Cite

Silalahi, Artha Debora. 2024. “The Paradox of State of Law Idea on Pancasila Philosophical Justification As Source of Law: Paradoks Ide Negara Hukum Dalam Justifikasi Filosofis Pancasila Sebagai Sumber Hukum”. Jurnal Konstitusi 21 (1):62-76. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2114.

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Konstitusi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
  2. The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  3. The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.