PENILAIAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP CABANG  PRODUKSI YANG DIKUASAI OLEH NEGARA: Penilaian Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Cabang Produksi yang Dikuasai oleh Negara

Desi Fitriyani

doi:10.31078/jk2116

Authors

Desi Fitriyani Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2464-7093

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2116

Keywords:

Production Branch, Constitutional Court, State Control

Abstract

The state controls production branches that are important to the state and/or affect the livelihood of the people at large. Regarding the evaluation, it is in the hands of the Government together with the Parliament. Problems then arise, when there are no indicators to carry out this assessment, leading to abuse of power and the privatization, injuring the right to control the state. On that basis, the Constitutional Court was present to conduct an assessment of the Government's assessment with the Parliament. This study aims to determine the Constitutional Court's role in carrying out this assessment. This research is normative legal research. Results of the study show that the Constitutional Court has exercised this authority by providing its judgment by reviewing the law. In the future, the Constitutional Court must issue indicators of branches of production controlled by the state based on Article 33 of UUD NRI 1945.

Author Biography

Desi Fitriyani, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Desi Fitriyani was born in Kendari City on December 24, 1999. She attended primary school at SD Negeri Lalembuu, Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri 3 Konawe Selatan, and Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 5 Palopo. She completed her undergraduate studies at the Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University. In 2023, she pursued her Master's degree with a concentration in Constitutional Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, Jakarta. Currently, Desi, as she is affectionately known, works as a content creator on the Advokat Konstitusi and DAW Education platforms. She has contributed to various national journals.

References

Ajie, Radita. “Batasan Pilihan Kebijakan Pembentuk Undang-Undang (Open Legal Policy) Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Legislasi Indonesia 13, no. 02 (2016): 111–20.

Alrah, Zikraini. “Kontrak Sosial Dalam Pandangan Rousseau.” Paradigma: Jurnal Kalam dan Filsafat 1, no. 01 (2022): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15408/paradigma.v1i01.27289.

Ardiansyah Ardiansyah, dan Aminuddin Aminuddin. “Dampak Privatisasi Terhadap Pengelolaan Dan Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Air Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 1, no. 2 (2020): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.46870/ jhki.v1i2.116.

Arizona, Yance. “Perkembangan konstitusionalitas Penguasaan negara atas sumber Daya alam Dalam Putusan mahkamah konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 8, no. 3 (20 Mei 2016): 257. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk833.

Djauhari. “Kajian Teori Welfare State Dalam Perspektif Barat Dan Islam.” Jurnal Hukum XVI (2006): 27–38.

Farhani, Athari, dan Ibnu Sina Chandranegara. “Penguasaan Negara terhadap Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam Ruang Angkasa Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 2 (2019): 235–54. https://doi. org/10.31078/jk1622.

Fortine, Carol A. “the Commerce Clause and Federalism - Implications for State Control of Natural-Resources.” George Washington Law Review 50, no. 4 (1982): 601–26.

Hadiyono, V. “Indonesia Dalam Menjawab Konsep Negara Welfare State dan Tatangannya.” Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Kekuasaan 1, no. 1 (2020): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.24167/ jhpk.v1i1.2672.

Hendri. “Konsekuensi Privatisasi.” Detik News, 2008. https://news.detik.com/ opini/d-882691/konsekuensi-privatisasi.

IDG, Palguna. Welfare State Vs Globalisasi. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2019.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 001-021- 022/PUU-1/2003 (2003).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 002/PUU-I/2003 (2003).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 11/PUU-XIV/2016 (2016).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 12/PUU-XIX/2021 (2021).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 3/PUU-VII/2010 (2010).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-VIX/2016 (2016).

Matompo, Osgar S. “Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Prespektif Keadaan Darurat.” Media Hukum 21, no. 1 (2014): 57–72. https://media.neliti.com/media/ publications/113633-ID-pembatasan-terhadap-hak-asasi-manusia-da.pdf.

Mujiburohman, Dian Aries. “Legalisasi Tanah-Tanah Bekas Hak Eigendom.” Jurnal Yudisial 14, no. 1 (2021): 117–37. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i1.443.

Mulyani, Lilis. “Pengelolaan SDA di Mata Mahkamah Konstitusi: Analisis Kritis atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang SDA.” Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya 10, no. 2 (2008): 65–88.

Nugroho, Ahmad Adi, Ahmad Juanidi, Ahmad Kaylani, Anak Agung Gde Danendra, Aru Armando, Berla Wahyu Pratama, Deswin Nur, et al. Negara dan Pasar dalam Bingkai Kebijakan Persaingan. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia, 2011.

Rachman, Irfan Nur. “Politik Hukum Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Menurut Pasal 33 UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 1 (2016): 195–212. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1319.

Redi, Ahmad. “Dinamika Konsepsi Penguasaan Negara Atas Sumber Daya Alam.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 401. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12210.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1997 tentang Ketenagalistrikan (1997).

Rostow, Eugene V., dan W. Friedmann. “The State and the Rule of Law in a Mixed Economy.” Columbia Law Review 72, no. 4 (1972): 788–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1121291.

Ruslan, Idrus. “Pemikiran ‘Kontrak Sosial’ Jean Jacques Rousseau dan Masa Depan Umat Beragama.” Al-AdYaN VIII, no. 2 (2013): 17–36.

Sari, Adena Fitri Puspita, dan Purwono Sungkono Raharjo. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator Dan Positive Legislator.” Souvereignty 1, no. 4 (2022): 681–91. https://journal.uns.ac.id/Souvereignty/article/view/112.

Sembiring, Julius. “Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Sumber Daya Agraria.” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 2, no. 2 (2016): 119–32. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v2i2.65.

Sondakh, Jemmy. “Revitalisasi Fungsi Provider Dalam Pengaturan Penjaminan Investasi Oleh Pemerintah Daerah Sebagai Upaya Untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Investasi 1.” Jurnal Hukum UNSRAT 22, no. 5 (2016): 56–68.

Uran, Peri, dan Pasquale Pasquino. “The Guardian of the Turkish Constitution: A Special Court.” Journal of Politics and Law 8, no. 2 (2015): 88–97. https://doi.org/10.5539/ jpl.v8n2p88.

Widowati, D.Y., Yurista, A.P., Rafael Edy Bosko, R.E. “Hak Penguasaan Atas Sumber Daya Alam Dalam Konsepsi Dan Penjabarannya Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Journal LEGISLASI INDONESIA 16, no. 2 (2019): 147–59.

Zon, Fadli, Muhammad Iskandar, dan Susanto Zuhdi. “Tinjauan Sejarah Hukum Pasal 33 UUD 1945 sebagai Ideologi Ekonomi.” Jurnal Negara Hukum 7, no. 1 (2016): 111-125. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v7i1.925.

Constitutional Court Assessment on Production Branches Controlled by The State