Public Participation in Law-Making Process: A Comparative Perspective of 5 (Five) Democratic Countries

Partisipasi Publik dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Perspektif Perbandingan 5 (Lima) Negara Demokratis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2123

Keywords:

Democracy, Constitution, Public Participation, Law-Making Process

Abstract


Public participation is the heart of the legislative process. Participation is crucial to ensure that the laws produced genuinely reflect the needs and aspirations of society, as well as to embody democracy and strengthen legitimacy. Through a normative juridical approach, the research aims to compare public participation in law-making in five democratic countries, namely Indonesia, the United States, the Philippines, South Africa, and South Korea, by analyzing their Constitutions and laws and regulations. The findings can then be used as best practices that can be adopted by Indonesia. The results of the study show that the Constitutions of the United States, the Philippines, South Africa, and South Korea guarantee public participation in the legislative process. In contrast, the Indonesian Constitution only affirms People’s Sovereignty. However, normatively, Indonesia regulates the role of the public more comprehensively and technically in the law-making process at every stage, further reinforced by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which mandates that the role of the public be more meaningful in law-making, as participation is a constitutional right held by citizens.

Author Biography

Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus, Faculty of Law University of Jember, Jember, East Java, Indonesia

Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus was born in Mojokerto, February 1, 1997, completed Bachelor of Law degree from the Universitas Jember in 2019 with Cumlaude predicate, and completed Master of Law degree from the Universitas Indonesia in 2021 with Cumlaude predicate. He currently serving as a Lecturer in Constitutional Law at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember and as a Researcher at the Center for Pancasila and Constitutional Studies (PUSKAPSI) Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember. He is also active as a writer in print and digital media columns such as detik.com, kompas.com, kumparan.com, hukumonline.com, Tempo and Harian Kompas (kompas.id). In 2021, he published book entitled "Realizing Participatory Law-Making".

References

Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Lembaga Khusus Di Bidang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang- Undangan: Urgensi Adopsi Dan Fungsinya Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17, no. 2 (2020): 131. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i2.665.

Bracher, Patrick. “Public Participation in South African Law-Making Process Is Essential.” Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot, 2019. https://www. financialinstitutionslegalsnapshot.com/2019/01/13/public-participation-in-south-african-law-making-process-is-essential/.

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Peraturan DPR tentang Pembentukan Undang-Undang, Peraturan DPR No. 44 Tahun 2020, BN. No. 668 Tahun 2020.

EIU. “Frontline Democracy and The Battle for Ukraine,” 2022.

Firdaus, Fahmi Ramadhan. “Pencegahan Korupsi Legislasi Melalui Penguatan Partisipasi Publik Dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17, no. 3 (2020): 282. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.679.

Heitshusen, Valerie. “Introduction to the Legislative Process in the U.S. Congress.” The Legislative Process in the United States Congress: An Introduction, 2013, 1–18.

Hidayati, Siti. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia Dengan Afrika Selatan).” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 3, no. 2 (2019): 224–41. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v3n2.18.

“How a Law Is Made - Parliament of South Africa,” n.d.

“How Our Laws Are Made - Congress.Gov Resources | Congress.Gov | Library of Congress.” Diakses Juni 3, 2024. https://www.congress.gov/help/learn-about-the-legislative-process/how-our-laws-are-made.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2005.

Irawan, Benny Bambang. “Perkembangan Demokrasi Di Indonesia.” Perspektif 5, no. 3 (2006): 54–64.

Isra, Saldi. Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi: Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2010.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.

Noviati, Cora Elly. “Demokrasi Dan Sistem Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 2 (2016): 333. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1027.

Philippines. The Constitution (1987) of the Republic of the Philippines

_____ . “The Legislative Branch | Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines,” n.d.

_____ . “Legislative Process - Senate of the Philippines,” n.d.

Purwaneni, Hartuti. “Demokrasi Indonesia: Dari Masa Ke Masa.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik 3, no. 2 (2013): 118–31.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 terkait “Uji Formil” UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja

Ramadhan, Wahyu Tio, and Eddy Purnama. “Perbandingan Prosedur Legislasi Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan 1, no. November (2017): 92–104.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

_____. Undang-Undang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik, UU No. 14 Tahun 2008, LN. No. 61 Tahun 2008. TLN. No. 4846.

_____. Undang-Undang MPR, DPR, DPD & DPRD, UU No. 17 Tahun 2014 sebagaimana diubah dengan UU No. 2 Tahun 2018, LN. No. 29 Tahun 2018, TLN. No. 6187.

_____. Undang-Undang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undanga, UU No. 13 Tahun 2022, LN. No. 143 Tahun 2022. TLN. No. 6801.

_____. Peraturan Presiden Peraturan Pelaksana Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Perpres No. 87 Tahun 2014, LN. No. 199 Tahun 2014.

Rhee, Woo-Young. “Partnership for Sustainability: NGO and Community Participation in Lawmaking in South Korea.” Journal of Korean Law | 11, no. June (2011): 171.

Riskiyono, Joko. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan.” Aspirasi 6, no. 2 (2015): 159–76.

Rizaty, Monavia Ayu. “Indeks Demokrasi Dunia 2021, Indonesia Masih Dinilai Lemah,” 2022. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/02/14/indeks-demokrasi-dunia-2021-indonesia-masih-dinilai-lemah

“Role of the Constitutional Court,” n.d.

SA Legislative Sector. Public Participation Framework for the South African Legislative Sector, 2013.

“Skor Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia Membaik, Tetapi Tantangan Masih Besar - Kompas. Id.” Diakses November 25, 2023. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2022/02/14/ peningkatan-skor-indeks-demokrasi-2021-tak-serta-merta-tandai-perbaikan-kualitas-demokrasi-indonesia.

South Africa. The Constitution of South Africa 1996

_____ . “What Parliament Does - Parliament of South Africa,” n.d.

South Korea. Constitution of South Korea

_____ . “The National Assembly of The Republic of Korea > INTRODUCTION > Activities & Powers > on Legislation,” n.d.

_____ “KOREAN LAW INFORMATION CENTER | ABOUT KOREAN LAW,” n.d.

_____ “Legislative Process - KoreanLII,” n.d.

United States. Constitution of the United States

_____ . “The Legislative Branch | The White House,” n.d.

_____ . “The Legislative Process | Congressman Bill Keating,” n.d.

_____ . “Enactment of a Law - Congress.Gov Resources | Congress.Gov | Library of Congress,” n.d.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Fahmi Ramadhan Firdaus. 2024. “Public Participation in Law-Making Process: A Comparative Perspective of 5 (Five) Democratic Countries: Partisipasi Publik Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Perspektif Perbandingan 5 (Lima) Negara Demokratis”. Jurnal Konstitusi 21 (2):203-25. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2123.

Issue

Section

Articles