Transformation of the Constitutional Justices Tenure After the Constitutional Court’s New Act

Transformasi Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2112

Keywords:

Constitutional Court Judge, Independence, Tenure, Transformation

Abstract


The periodization system in the constitutional judges’ position has the opportunity to undermine the judges’ independence. the opportunity to be re-elected as an opening for political transactions between constitutional judges with the proposing institution. The enactment of Act No. 7/2020 is a new era for the system used in the constitutional judges’ term. The periodization of the Constitutional Court judges’ term was replaced based on the age limit of 70 years. This research examines the design of Constitutional Court judges’ terms after the enactment Act No. 7/ 2020. This article is written based on normative legal research. This study concludes that the transformation of the Constitutional Court judges’ term into non-periodization aims to strengthen the independence of Constitutional judges from any intervention. At the same time as a fortress from external pressure and ensures that judges do not face conflicts of interest arising from the possibility of extending the term.

Author Biographies

M Beni Kurniawan, Muara Bulian Religious Court, Batanghari, Indonesia

M. Beni Kurniawan, S. Sy, M. H., was born in Pariaman, West Sumatra, on September 15, 1992. He completed his undergraduate education (S1) as the valedictorian at the Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. He pursued his postgraduate education (S2) at the Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia, graduating with the highest honors, summa cum laude. Currently, he works at the Supreme Court with the position of Judge at the Religious Court of Muara Bulian. He also teaches as a Practitioner Lecturer in a teaching practitioner program initiated by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. He has served as the Deputy Coordinator for IMMH Studies at the University of Indonesia. He focuses on issues related to Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Family Law.

Dinora Refiasari, Krui Religious Court, West Lampung, Indonesia

Dinora Refiasari, S. Kom., was born in Liwa, Lampung, on February 16, 1997. She completed her undergraduate education (S1) at the University of Lampung with a concentration in Computer Science. Currently, she works as a Computer Practitioner Expert at the Supreme Court within the Krui Religious Court unit. She has organizational experience serving as the secretary of the Special Body of the Computer Science Student Association. Additionally, she was an awardee of the KSE (Karya Salemba Empat) scholarship in 2016.

References

Agustine, Oly Viana, Erlina Maria Christin Sinaga, and Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri. 2019. “Politik Hukum Penguatan Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan”. Jurnal Konstitusi 16 (2):313-38. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1626.

Baihaki, Muhammad Reza, Fathudin Fathudin, dan Ahmad Tholabi Kharlie. “Problematika Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy) Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 3 (2020): 652–75. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1739.

Borda, Aldo Zammit. “The appointment, tenure and removal of judges under commonwealth principles: A compendium and analysis of best practice.” Commonwealth Law Bulletin 41, no. 3 (2015): 325. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2015.1080435.

Central Council of The International Association of Judges in Taipes, https://www.fjc.gov/ sites/default/files/2015/Universal%20Charter%20of%20the%20Judge.pdf diakses 26 Juli 2022.

Doly, Denico, dan Noverdi Puja Saputra. “Politik Hukum Undang-Undang tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Bidang Hukum Info Kajian. Jakarta, September 2020. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pusaka/ files/info_singkat/Info Singkat-XII-17-I-P3DI-September-2020-208.pdf.

European Commission for Democracy through Law. The Composition of Constitutional Courts, Science and technique of democracy, No. 20 CDL-STD(1997)020, Desember 1997.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “A Critical Analysis of Judicial Appointment Process and Tenure of Constitutional Justice in Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 2 (2016): 152 - 69. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n2.301.

Gede, I, Hartadi Kurniawan, dan Henry Arianto. “Polemik Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Untuk Jabatan Publik Di Indonesia Terkait Dengan Demokrasi Dan Pancasila.” Lex Jurnalica 17, no. 3 (2020): 264 - 70. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/3697.

Graber, Mark A. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. By Lawrence Baum. Princeton: Princeton. Perspectives on Politics. Vol. 5. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070995.

Hafiez, Fachri Audhia. “Jimly Asshiddiqie Usulkan Hakim MK Minimal Berusia 60 Tahun.” Media Indonesia, 2023. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/570060/jimly-asshiddiqie-usulkan-hakim-mk-minimal-berusia-60-tahun.

Hantoro, Novianto Murti. “Periode Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi dan Implikasinya terhadap Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Term of Office for Constitutional Justices and Its Implications against Judicial Independence).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 11, no. 2 (2020): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh. v11i2.1705.

Indonesia Corruption Watch, “Arief Hidayat Harus Mundur dari Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi” https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/arief-hidayat-harus-mundur-dari-jabatan-hakim-konstitusi , diakses pada 03 November 2022.

Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang MK. Jakarta, 2017.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XVIII/2020.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 103/ PUU-XVIII/2022.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

O’Brien, Derek. “The Constitutional Systems of the Commonwealth Caribbean.” The Constitutional Systems of the Commonwealth Caribbean. Constitutional Systems of the World. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing Oxford, United Kingdom, 2014.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Mahkamah Konstitusi, Dasar Pemikiran, Kewenangan dan Perbandingan dengan Negara Lain. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2018.

Pratiwi, Afriza Linta. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi dalam UU No 7 Tahun 2020 Perspektif Maslahah.” UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri, 2022.

Pusat Studi Hukum (PSH) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, “Eksaminasi Publik Putusan MK atas UU KPK” https://www.uii.ac.id/eksaminasi-publik-putusan-mk-atas-uu-kpk/, diakses pada 03 November 2022.

Thontowi, Jawahir. “Kedudukan dan Fungsi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.” J. Huk. Ius Quia Iustum 18, no. 2 (2011): 185–302.

Trisulo, Evy. “Konfigurasi State Auxiliary Bodies dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia.” Universitas Indonesia, 2012.

Wibowo, Mardian. “Menakar Konstitusionalitas sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 196-216. https://doi. org/10.31078/jk1221.

Winston, Frederic, Nalle 1, Margareta Diana Pangastuti, dan Yohana R S S S Budi Utami. “Analisis determinan faktor penentu usia harapan hidup di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur.” Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan dan Manajemen 18, no. 3 (2022): 459 - 72. https:// journal.feb.unmul.ac.id/index.php/INOVASI/article/view/10813.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01 — Updated on 2024-03-30

Versions

How to Cite

Kurniawan, M Beni, and Dinora Refiasari. (2024) 2024. “Transformation of the Constitutional Justices Tenure After the Constitutional Court’s New Act: Transformasi Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 21 (1):18-34. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2112.

Issue

Section

Articles