Kedudukan Hukum Khusus dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

  • Fitra Arsil Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia
  • Qurrata Ayuni Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk19410

Keywords:

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Kedudukan Hukum, Pengujian Undang-Undang, Partai Politik.

Abstract


In general, the Constitutional Court has the view that political parties that have seats in the DPR and/or members of the DPR already have legislative space and do not have the legal standing to review laws. However, there are a number of exceptions in many cases where political parties and members of the DPR are considered to have a special position even though they are also discussing the passed laws. This paper discusses the jurisprudential pattern of the Constitutional Court in granting special legal status to political parties and members of the DPR. Using the case approach method in collaboration with the comparison method this paper seeks to map the potential for testing with specific constitutional rights. The findings in this paper reinforce the concept that although the results of law formation in the legislature and legal review in the judiciary are equally binding for citizens, the process of law formation and legal review has a different character and these differences are beneficial within the framework of checks and balances.

References

Jurnal
Ali, Mohammad Mahrus. “Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, No. 1 (2016): 172-195.
Cross, Frank B. “Pragmatic Pathologies of Judicial Review of Administrative Rulemaking.” North Carolina Law Review 78 (1999): 1013-1070.
Geoffrey Brennan dan Alan Hamlin. “On political representation.” British Journal of Political Science 29, No. 1 (1999): 109-127.
Harrison, John. “Legislative power and judicial power.” Constitutional Commentary 31 (2016): 295-316.
Indra Lesmana, Ardiansah, dan Bahrun Azmi. “The Final Power of the Decision of the Constitutional Court in Indonesian Positive Law.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 5, No. 1 (2022): 1765-1775.
Issacharoff, Samuel. “Judging Politics: The Elusive Quest for Judicial Review of Political Fairness.” Texas Law Review 71 (1992): 1643-1702.
Lailam, Tanto. “Problem dan Solusi Penataan Checks and Balances System dalam Pembentukan dan Pengujian Undang-Undang di Indonesia (Problem and Solutions for Arranging of The Checks and Balances System in The Process of Making Law and Constitutional Review in Indonesia).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 12, No. 1 (2021): 123-142.
McGinnis, John O. and Ilya Somin. “Federalism vs. States’ Rights: A Defense of Judicial Review in a Federal System.” North Western University Law Review 99, No. 1 (2004): 3-45.
Mureinik, Etienne. "A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights.” South African Journal on Human Rights 10, No. 1 (1994): 31-48.
Nelson, Caleb. “Judicial Review of Legislative Purpose.” New York University Law Review 83 (2008): 1784-1879.
Neuman, Gerald L. "Human Rights and Constitutional Rights: Harmony and Dissonance," Stanford Law Review 55, No. 5 (2002): 1863-1900.
Nurtjahjo, Hendra. “Lembaga, Badan, Dan Komisi Negara Independen (State Auxiliary Agencies) di Indonesia: Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara ” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 35, No. 3 (2005): 275-287.
Posner, Eric A. "Erga Omnes Norms, Institutionalization, and Constitutionalism in International Law," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/ Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft (2009): 5-23.
Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Cristian Pop-Eleches, dan Andrei Shleifer. "Judicial Checks and Balances." Journal of Political Economy 112, No. 2 (2004): 445-470.
Rogers, James R. "Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative and Judicial Interaction," American Journal of Political Science (2001): 84-99.
Rogers, James R. and Joseph Daniel Ura. "A Majoritarian Basis for Judicial Countermajoritarianism," Journal of Theoretical Politics 32, No. 3 (2020): 435-459.
Calabresi, Steven G. and Joan L. Larsen. “One Person One Office: Separation of Powers or Separation of Personnel.” Cornell Law Review 79 (1993): 1045.-1153
Vanberg, Georg. "Abstract Judicial Review, Legislative Bargaining, and Policy Compromise." 10, No. 3 (1998): 299-326.

Buku
Arsil, Fitra. Teori Sistem Pemerintahan: Pergeseran Konsep dan Saling Kontribusi Antar Sistem Pemerintahan di Berbagai Negara. (Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2017).
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, Edited and with an Introduction by Ian Shapiro. (New Heaven and London: Yale University Press, 2003).
Shane, Peter M. Madison’s Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009)
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Commentary on the Bangalore Principle of Judicial Conduct. (Vienna, 2007).

Skripsi/Tesis/Disertasi
Ifani, Inggrit. “Legal Standing Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi RI (Tinjauan Yuridis dan Praktis Pasal 51 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003).” Skripsi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta (2015).
Pandiangan, Wita Rohana. “Legal Standing Anggota DPR dalam Pengujian Undang- Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Terhadap Beberapa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi).” Skripsi Sarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara (2018).
Rahmani, Sofia Asri. "Legal Standing Anggota DPR RI dalam Judicial Review Undang- Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016." Disertasi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati (2018).
Safira, Aulia Dina. “Implikasi Status Hukum Partai Politik Sebagai Badan Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Tesis Universitas Islam Indonesia (2022).

Makalah
Arsil, Fitra. "Memahami Realitas Parlemen Indonesia dalam Rangka Reformasi" Makalah dalam Seminar “Parliamentary Reform” yang diselenggarakan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia (27 April 2015).

Internet
Akhmadi, Yudono Yanuar. “MK: Penyadapan atas Setya pada Kasus Papa Minta Saham Ilegal.” Tempo. Diakses pada 1 November 2022. https://nasional.tempo. co/read/802445/mk-penyadapan-atas-setya-pada-kasus-papa-minta-saham-ilegal.
James Madison, "Federalist No.48. Founding Fathers. Diakses pada 17 Oktober 2022. http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed48.htm.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Arsil, Fitra, and Qurrata Ayuni. 2022. “Kedudukan Hukum Khusus Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 19 (4):957-80. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk19410.

Issue

Section

Articles