The Relationship between DKPP and PTUN Decisions regarding Ethical Violation by General Election Administrators

Ahmad Siboy, Dewi Cahyandari

Abstract


The commissioner of the general election administration was discharged through the decision of the General Election Administrator Honorary Council (DKPP). The decision is not final and binding at the executive branch, considering that the decision can be cancelled by the Administrative Court. This study aims to define the authority of DKPP and PTUN in resolving ethical violations committed by election administrators and parse the implications and relationships of the decisions of the two institutions. This paper also proposes an ideal concept for the design of solving ethical violations of election administrators in the future. This study uses normative juridical methods. The results showed that the DKPP and PTUN have overlapping authority but with different decisions. DKPP purely adjudicates ethical issues, and the Administrative Court adjudicates the Presidential Decree, which is a follow-up to the DKPP decision. To avoid conflicting decisions on cases that intersect, violations of the code of ethics in the future must be resolved with a settlement mechanism by the judiciary.

Keywords


General Election Administrator; Violation of Code of Ethics; Decision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Ali, Ahmad. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence), Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2019.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Peradilan Etik Dan Etika Konstitusi: Perspektif Baru Tentang ‘Rule of Law and Rule of Ethics & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethics. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Fatmawati. Struktur Dan Fungsi Legislasi Parlemen Dengan Sistem Multikameral: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia Dan Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia Press, 2010.

Fuller, Lon Luvois. The Morality of Law. London and New Heaven: Yale University Press, 1969.

Ridwan, HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafido Persada, 2008.

S.F., Marbun. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2012.

Said, Umar. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Journals

Bertin, Bertin. “Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Terhadap Perilaku Hakim Dihubungkan Dengan Independensi Hakim Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Legal Opinion 1, no. 3 (2013):1-10.

Chakim, M. “Desain Institusional Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Sebagai Peradilan Etik.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 2 (2014): 393–408 https://doi.org/10.31078/jk11210

Endang, M. Ikbar Andi, Moh Fadli, Istislam Istislam, and Dewi Cahyandari. "Dialectics of the Urgency of Reforming The Law of State Administrative Justice as a Synthesis." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 22, no. 1 (2022): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3194

Monteiro, Josef M. “Teori Penemuan Hukum Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS 6, no. 3 (2018): 267–86. https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v6i3.3198.

Nasef, M. Imam. “Studi Kritis Mengenai Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Mengawal Electoral Integrity Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 21, no. 3 (2014): 378–401. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol21.iss3.art3.

Puspitasari, Dyan. “Peran Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Menjaga Kemandirian Dan Integritas Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia.” Lentera Hukum 5, no. 3 (2018): 403-414. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v5i3.5841.

Remaja, I Nyoman Gede. “Penerapan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah Bagian Dari Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Yang Harus Dijamin Oleh Negara.” Kertha Widya 6, no. 1 (2019): 8-19. https://doi.org/10.37637/kw.v6i1.293.

Siboy, Ahmad. "Pilihan Desain Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara." De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar'iah 14, no. 1 (2022): 75-91. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v14i1.12736

Yulistyowati, Efi, Endah Pujiastuti, and Tri Mulyani. “Penerapan Konsep Trias Politica Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia : Studi Komparatif Atas Undang–Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Sebelum Dan Sesudah Amandemen.” Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya 18, no. 2 (2017): 328-338. https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v18i2.580.

Legislation

Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Court (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2009 Number 160, Addendum to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5079)

Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2014 concerning Elections of Governors, Regents, and Mayors into Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 130, Addendum to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5898)

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Election (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2017 Number 317)

The decision of DKPP Number 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019

The decision of PTUN Jakarta Number 82/G/2020 PTUN-JKT

Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021

Presidential Decree Number 34/P of 2020 concerning Dishonorable Discharge of the Member of KPU Tenure Period 2017-2022

Presidential Decree Number 83/P of 2020 concerning Revocation of Presidential Decree Number 34/P of 2020 concerning Dishonorable Discharge of the Member of KPU Tenure Period 2017-2022

Internet

(https://ngobrolinhukum.wordpress.com/2013/02/05/memahami-kepastian-dalam-hukum/) retrieved on18 June 2022 at 09:20 WIB

https://dkpp.go.id/sejarah-dkpp/ retrieved on 18 June 2022 at 09:20 WIB

https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewan_Kehormatan_Penyelenggara_Pemilihan_Umum retrieved on 18 June 2022 at 09:20 WIB




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1936

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 164 times
PDF view : 65 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.