Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia

Catur Alfath Satriya

Abstract


One of the features of the presidential system is the process of presidential impeachment. Before the amendment, Indonesia did not have a clear mechanism to impeach the president in the middle of his term. The impeachment of the president is determined by a majority vote in the People’s Consultative Assembly. This is a problem because the impeachment of the president only uses a political process, and there is no legal process in it. After the amendment, the presidential impeachment concept was born that in a presidential system, the president cannot be dismissed only through a political process; there must be a legal process before the political process. Based on the analysis, the process of presidential impeachment in Indonesia does not follow the principle of checks and balances. This is because the impeachment process for the president in Indonesia does not involve the second chamber in the process


Keywords


Presidential Impeachment; checks and balances; Constitution

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara, cet. 4. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012

Kada, Naoko. (2002). Politics of Impeachment in Latin America. Thesis (Ph. D.). University of California, San Diego, 2002.

Linan, Anibal Perez. Presidential impeachment and the new political instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Mamuji, Sri, et.al. Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.

Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mekanisme Impeachment dan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2005.

Muthoo, Abhinay & Shepsle, Kenneth. The Constitutional Choice of Bicameralism. MPRA Paper 5825, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2007.

Soekanto Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, cet. 3. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2012.

Tarihoran, Naf’an. Makna impeachment presiden bagi orang Amerika. Tesis Magister Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta, 1999.

Zoelva, Hamdan. Impeachment presiden: alasan tindak pidana pemberhentian presiden menurut uud 1945. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.

Jurnal

Arry. “Impeachment Dalam Sistem Presidensial: Kajian Teoritik dan Normatif di Indonesia Sebelum dan Sesudah Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Volume 3, No. 1 (Februari 2016): 1-13.

AKGEMCİ, Esra. “Authoritarian Populism as a Response to Crisis: The Case of Brazil.” Uluslararası İlişkiler / International Relations 19, no. 74 (2022): 37–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27130875.

Doval, Gisela Pereyra, and Esteban Actis. “The Political and Economic Instability of Dilma Rousseff's Second Government in Brazil: Between Impeachment and the Pragmatic Turn.” India Quarterly 72, no. 2 (2016): 120–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48505491.

Faiz, Pan Muhammad, Erfa Redhani. “Analisis Perbandingan Peran kamar Kedua Parlemen dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Proses Pemberhentian Presiden.” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 15, No. 2 (Juni 2018), 231-256, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1521

Ginsburg, Tom, Aziz Huq, and David Landau. “The Comparative Constitutional Law of Presidential Impeachment.” The University of Chicago Law Review 88, no. 1 (2021): 81–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26966492.

Hadi, Syofyan. “Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden (Studi Perbandingan antara Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, dan Filipina).” DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 12, No. 23 (Februari 2016): 1-15, https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v12i23

Hinojosa, Victor J., and Aníbal S. Pérez-Liñán. “Presidential Survival and the Impeachment Process: The United States and Colombia.” Political Science Quarterly 121, no. 4 (2006): 653–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20202766

Isenbergh, Joseph. “Impeachment and Presidential Immunity from Judicial Process.” Yale Law & Policy Review 18, no. 1 (1999): 53–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40239516

Katyal, Neal Kumar. “Impeachment as Congressional Constitutional Interpretation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 63, no. 1/2 (2000): 169–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1192447.

Kopchak, Kyle. “Overview of Bicameral Legislatures Potential Impact on the Executive Selection Process.” Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design Volume 9, Article 2 (Maret 2022): 1-27.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol9/iss1/2/?utm_source=www.repository.law.indiana.edu%2Fijcd%2Fvol9%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Palmer, Niall. “Legitimizing Impeachment.” Journal of American Studies 33, no. 2 (1999): 343–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27556649.

Passaglia, Paolo. “Unicameralism, Bicameralism, Multicameralism: Evolution and Trends in Europe.” Perspective on Federalism Vol. 10, issue 2 (2018): 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0014

Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. “A Two-Level Theory of Presidential Instability.” Latin American Politics and Society 56, no. 1 (2014): 34–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43286513.

Syawawi, Reza. “Pengaturan Pemberhentian Presiden dalam Masa Jabatan Menurut UUD 1945 (Studi Komparatif Sebelum dan Sesudah Perubahan).” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 7, No. 6 (Desember 2010): 54-96. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk763

Toding, Adventus. “DPD dalam Struktur Parlemen Indonesia: Wacana Pemusnahan versus Penguatan,” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 14, No. 2 (Juni 2017): 296-314. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1423

Peraturan perundang-undangan

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 sebelum amandemen

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 setelah amandemen

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah, UU No. 17 tahun 2014, LN No. 182 tahun 2014, TLN No. 5568

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi, UU No. 24 tahun 2003, LN No. 98 tahun 2003, TLN No. 4316

Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pedoman Beracara dalam Memutus Pendapat

Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Mengenai Dugaan Pelanggaran Oleh Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden, PMK No. 21 tahun 2009

Indonesia, Peraturan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia tentang Tata Tertib, Peraturan DPR No. 1 tahun 2014

Indonesia, Peraturan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia tentang Tata Tertib, Peraturan MPR No. 1 tahun 2014

Konstitusi di Negara Lain

Amerika Serikat, United States of America's Constitution of 1789 with Amendments through 1992

Argentina, Constitution of the Argentine Nation

Afrika Selatan, South Africa's Constitution of 1996 with Amendments through 2012

Bolivia, Bolivia's Constitution of 2009

Brazil, Brazil's Constitution of 1988 with Amendments through 2014

Chili, Chile's Constitution of 1980 with Amendments through 2015

Filipina, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines

Kolombia, Colombia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments through 2013

Kenya, Kenya's Constitution of 2010

Meksiko, Mexico's Constitution of 1917 with Amendments through 2015

Paraguay, Paraguay's Constitution of 1992 with Amendments through 2011

Republik Dominika, Dominican Republic's Constitution of 2015

Uruguay, Uruguay's Constitution of 1966, Reinstated in 1985, with Amendments through 2004

Lain-Lain

Perez-Linan, Anibal. The Institutional Determinants of Impeachment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228423583_The_Institutional_Determinants_of_Impeachment (2000).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1932

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 147 times
PDF view : 89 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.