Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1932Keywords:
Presidential Impeachment, checks and balances, ConstitutionAbstract
One of the features of the presidential system is the process of presidential impeachment. Before the amendment, Indonesia did not have a clear mechanism to impeach the president in the middle of his term. The impeachment of the president is determined by a majority vote in the People’s Consultative Assembly. This is a problem because the impeachment of the president only uses a political process, and there is no legal process in it. After the amendment, the presidential impeachment concept was born that in a presidential system, the president cannot be dismissed only through a political process; there must be a legal process before the political process. Based on the analysis, the process of presidential impeachment in Indonesia does not follow the principle of checks and balances. This is because the impeachment process for the president in Indonesia does not involve the second chamber in the process
References
Buku
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara, cet. 4. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012
Kada, Naoko. (2002). Politics of Impeachment in Latin America. Thesis (Ph. D.). University of California, San Diego, 2002.
Linan, Anibal Perez. Presidential impeachment and the new political instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Mamuji, Sri, et.al. Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mekanisme Impeachment dan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2005.
Muthoo, Abhinay & Shepsle, Kenneth. The Constitutional Choice of Bicameralism. MPRA Paper 5825, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2007.
Soekanto Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, cet. 3. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2012.
Tarihoran, Naf’an. Makna impeachment presiden bagi orang Amerika. Tesis Magister Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta, 1999.
Zoelva, Hamdan. Impeachment presiden: alasan tindak pidana pemberhentian presiden menurut uud 1945. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
Jurnal
Arry. “Impeachment Dalam Sistem Presidensial: Kajian Teoritik dan Normatif di Indonesia Sebelum dan Sesudah Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Volume 3, No. 1 (Februari 2016): 1-13.
AKGEMCİ, Esra. “Authoritarian Populism as a Response to Crisis: The Case of Brazil.” Uluslararası İlişkiler / International Relations 19, no. 74 (2022): 37–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27130875.
Doval, Gisela Pereyra, and Esteban Actis. “The Political and Economic Instability of Dilma Rousseff's Second Government in Brazil: Between Impeachment and the Pragmatic Turn.” India Quarterly 72, no. 2 (2016): 120–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48505491.
Faiz, Pan Muhammad, Erfa Redhani. “Analisis Perbandingan Peran kamar Kedua Parlemen dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Proses Pemberhentian Presiden.” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 15, No. 2 (Juni 2018), 231-256, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1521
Ginsburg, Tom, Aziz Huq, and David Landau. “The Comparative Constitutional Law of Presidential Impeachment.” The University of Chicago Law Review 88, no. 1 (2021): 81–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26966492.
Hadi, Syofyan. “Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden (Studi Perbandingan antara Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, dan Filipina).” DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 12, No. 23 (Februari 2016): 1-15, https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v12i23
Hinojosa, Victor J., and Aníbal S. Pérez-Liñán. “Presidential Survival and the Impeachment Process: The United States and Colombia.” Political Science Quarterly 121, no. 4 (2006): 653–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20202766
Isenbergh, Joseph. “Impeachment and Presidential Immunity from Judicial Process.” Yale Law & Policy Review 18, no. 1 (1999): 53–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40239516
Katyal, Neal Kumar. “Impeachment as Congressional Constitutional Interpretation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 63, no. 1/2 (2000): 169–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1192447.
Kopchak, Kyle. “Overview of Bicameral Legislatures Potential Impact on the Executive Selection Process.” Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design Volume 9, Article 2 (Maret 2022): 1-27.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol9/iss1/2/?utm_source=www.repository.law.indiana.edu%2Fijcd%2Fvol9%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Palmer, Niall. “Legitimizing Impeachment.” Journal of American Studies 33, no. 2 (1999): 343–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27556649.
Passaglia, Paolo. “Unicameralism, Bicameralism, Multicameralism: Evolution and Trends in Europe.” Perspective on Federalism Vol. 10, issue 2 (2018): 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0014
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. “A Two-Level Theory of Presidential Instability.” Latin American Politics and Society 56, no. 1 (2014): 34–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43286513.
Syawawi, Reza. “Pengaturan Pemberhentian Presiden dalam Masa Jabatan Menurut UUD 1945 (Studi Komparatif Sebelum dan Sesudah Perubahan).” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 7, No. 6 (Desember 2010): 54-96. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk763
Toding, Adventus. “DPD dalam Struktur Parlemen Indonesia: Wacana Pemusnahan versus Penguatan,” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 14, No. 2 (Juni 2017): 296-314. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1423
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 sebelum amandemen
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 setelah amandemen
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah, UU No. 17 tahun 2014, LN No. 182 tahun 2014, TLN No. 5568
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi, UU No. 24 tahun 2003, LN No. 98 tahun 2003, TLN No. 4316
Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pedoman Beracara dalam Memutus Pendapat
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Mengenai Dugaan Pelanggaran Oleh Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden, PMK No. 21 tahun 2009
Indonesia, Peraturan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia tentang Tata Tertib, Peraturan DPR No. 1 tahun 2014
Indonesia, Peraturan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia tentang Tata Tertib, Peraturan MPR No. 1 tahun 2014
Konstitusi di Negara Lain
Amerika Serikat, United States of America's Constitution of 1789 with Amendments through 1992
Argentina, Constitution of the Argentine Nation
Afrika Selatan, South Africa's Constitution of 1996 with Amendments through 2012
Bolivia, Bolivia's Constitution of 2009
Brazil, Brazil's Constitution of 1988 with Amendments through 2014
Chili, Chile's Constitution of 1980 with Amendments through 2015
Filipina, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines
Kolombia, Colombia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments through 2013
Kenya, Kenya's Constitution of 2010
Meksiko, Mexico's Constitution of 1917 with Amendments through 2015
Paraguay, Paraguay's Constitution of 1992 with Amendments through 2011
Republik Dominika, Dominican Republic's Constitution of 2015
Uruguay, Uruguay's Constitution of 1966, Reinstated in 1985, with Amendments through 2004
Lain-Lain
Perez-Linan, Anibal. The Institutional Determinants of Impeachment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228423583_The_Institutional_Determinants_of_Impeachment (2000).
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara, cet. 4. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012
Kada, Naoko. (2002). Politics of Impeachment in Latin America. Thesis (Ph. D.). University of California, San Diego, 2002.
Linan, Anibal Perez. Presidential impeachment and the new political instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Mamuji, Sri, et.al. Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mekanisme Impeachment dan Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2005.
Muthoo, Abhinay & Shepsle, Kenneth. The Constitutional Choice of Bicameralism. MPRA Paper 5825, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2007.
Soekanto Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, cet. 3. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2012.
Tarihoran, Naf’an. Makna impeachment presiden bagi orang Amerika. Tesis Magister Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta, 1999.
Zoelva, Hamdan. Impeachment presiden: alasan tindak pidana pemberhentian presiden menurut uud 1945. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
Jurnal
Arry. “Impeachment Dalam Sistem Presidensial: Kajian Teoritik dan Normatif di Indonesia Sebelum dan Sesudah Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Volume 3, No. 1 (Februari 2016): 1-13.
AKGEMCİ, Esra. “Authoritarian Populism as a Response to Crisis: The Case of Brazil.” Uluslararası İlişkiler / International Relations 19, no. 74 (2022): 37–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27130875.
Doval, Gisela Pereyra, and Esteban Actis. “The Political and Economic Instability of Dilma Rousseff's Second Government in Brazil: Between Impeachment and the Pragmatic Turn.” India Quarterly 72, no. 2 (2016): 120–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48505491.
Faiz, Pan Muhammad, Erfa Redhani. “Analisis Perbandingan Peran kamar Kedua Parlemen dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Proses Pemberhentian Presiden.” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 15, No. 2 (Juni 2018), 231-256, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1521
Ginsburg, Tom, Aziz Huq, and David Landau. “The Comparative Constitutional Law of Presidential Impeachment.” The University of Chicago Law Review 88, no. 1 (2021): 81–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26966492.
Hadi, Syofyan. “Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden (Studi Perbandingan antara Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, dan Filipina).” DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 12, No. 23 (Februari 2016): 1-15, https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v12i23
Hinojosa, Victor J., and Aníbal S. Pérez-Liñán. “Presidential Survival and the Impeachment Process: The United States and Colombia.” Political Science Quarterly 121, no. 4 (2006): 653–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20202766
Isenbergh, Joseph. “Impeachment and Presidential Immunity from Judicial Process.” Yale Law & Policy Review 18, no. 1 (1999): 53–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40239516
Katyal, Neal Kumar. “Impeachment as Congressional Constitutional Interpretation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 63, no. 1/2 (2000): 169–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1192447.
Kopchak, Kyle. “Overview of Bicameral Legislatures Potential Impact on the Executive Selection Process.” Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design Volume 9, Article 2 (Maret 2022): 1-27.https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol9/iss1/2/?utm_source=www.repository.law.indiana.edu%2Fijcd%2Fvol9%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Palmer, Niall. “Legitimizing Impeachment.” Journal of American Studies 33, no. 2 (1999): 343–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27556649.
Passaglia, Paolo. “Unicameralism, Bicameralism, Multicameralism: Evolution and Trends in Europe.” Perspective on Federalism Vol. 10, issue 2 (2018): 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0014
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. “A Two-Level Theory of Presidential Instability.” Latin American Politics and Society 56, no. 1 (2014): 34–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43286513.
Syawawi, Reza. “Pengaturan Pemberhentian Presiden dalam Masa Jabatan Menurut UUD 1945 (Studi Komparatif Sebelum dan Sesudah Perubahan).” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 7, No. 6 (Desember 2010): 54-96. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk763
Toding, Adventus. “DPD dalam Struktur Parlemen Indonesia: Wacana Pemusnahan versus Penguatan,” Jurnal Konstitusi Volume 14, No. 2 (Juni 2017): 296-314. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1423
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 sebelum amandemen
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 setelah amandemen
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah, UU No. 17 tahun 2014, LN No. 182 tahun 2014, TLN No. 5568
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi, UU No. 24 tahun 2003, LN No. 98 tahun 2003, TLN No. 4316
Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pedoman Beracara dalam Memutus Pendapat
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Mengenai Dugaan Pelanggaran Oleh Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden, PMK No. 21 tahun 2009
Indonesia, Peraturan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia tentang Tata Tertib, Peraturan DPR No. 1 tahun 2014
Indonesia, Peraturan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia tentang Tata Tertib, Peraturan MPR No. 1 tahun 2014
Konstitusi di Negara Lain
Amerika Serikat, United States of America's Constitution of 1789 with Amendments through 1992
Argentina, Constitution of the Argentine Nation
Afrika Selatan, South Africa's Constitution of 1996 with Amendments through 2012
Bolivia, Bolivia's Constitution of 2009
Brazil, Brazil's Constitution of 1988 with Amendments through 2014
Chili, Chile's Constitution of 1980 with Amendments through 2015
Filipina, The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines
Kolombia, Colombia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments through 2013
Kenya, Kenya's Constitution of 2010
Meksiko, Mexico's Constitution of 1917 with Amendments through 2015
Paraguay, Paraguay's Constitution of 1992 with Amendments through 2011
Republik Dominika, Dominican Republic's Constitution of 2015
Uruguay, Uruguay's Constitution of 1966, Reinstated in 1985, with Amendments through 2004
Lain-Lain
Perez-Linan, Anibal. The Institutional Determinants of Impeachment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228423583_The_Institutional_Determinants_of_Impeachment (2000).
Downloads
Published
2022-08-30
How to Cite
Satriya, Catur Alfath. 2022. “Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Konstitusi 19 (3):528-53. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1932.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
