Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Rahayu Prasetianingsih

Abstract


Accountability in Indonesia has been known the extent of the public administration within the executive power, while for representative bodies and judicial power is only in the system administration. Public demands for accountability from all over the government institution are no exception of judicial power. It’s triggered by “mafia peradilan” issue and other distrust so it needs judicial accountability. Problems arise when faced with the principles of accountability and independence and impartiality   of the judiciary. But in fact these two principles is not the core problem of accountability judiciary, there’s  many factors  influence.


Keywords


performance accountability; judicial independency; judiciary

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bagir Manan, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Republik Indonesia, LPPM Unisba, Bandung, 1995.

Bagir Manan, Menegakkan Hukum Suatu pencarian, (Jakarta: Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia, 2009).

Bagir Manan & Kuntana Magnar, Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, (Bandung: Alumni, 1997).

Carl Schmitt, Constitutional Theory, translated & edited by Jeffrey Seitzer, (Durham&London: Duke University Press, 2008).

Daniel E. Farber & Suzanna Sherry, Judgment Calls Principles and Politics in Constitutional Law, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).

Eric Barendt, An Introduction Constitutional Law, (London: Clarendon Law Series, Oxford University Press, 1998)

Frank Vibert, The Rise of the Unelected Democracy and the New Separation of Powers, ebook, (Cambridge, New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007).

Miriam Budiarjo, Dasar-Dasar ilmu Politik, edisi Revisi Cetakan ke- empat Oktober 2009 (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka, 2009)

Siri Gloppen, The Accountability Function of the Courts in Tanzania and Zambia, dalam Siri Gloppen, Roberto Gargarella and Elin Skaar (ed), Democratization and The Judiciary, The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, ebook, (Oregon, Frank Cass Publisher, 2005).

Sri Soemantri, Hak Menguji Materil Di Indonesia, (Bandung: Alumni, 1997).

Ziyad Motala & Cryril Ramaphosa, Constitutional Law analysis and Cases, (Southern Africa, Cape Town: Oxford University Press, Published in South Africa, 2002)

Beverley McLachlin, P.C., Judicial Accountability Remarks of the Right Presented at the Law and Parliament Conference Ottawa, Novem- ber 2, 2006.

Garreth Griffith, Judicial Accountability, Background Paper No. 1/98 published by the NSW Parliamentary Library, http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/gi/library/publicn.html

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pembangunan dan Penegakan Hukum, Disampaikan pada acara Seminar “Menyoal Moral Penegak Hukum” dalam rangka Lustrum XI Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada. 17 Februari 2006, www.jimly.com.

John M. Ackerman, Social Accountability in the Public Sector A Conceptual Discussion, Social Development Paper, Participation and Civic Engagement, Paper No. 82 / March 2005, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPCENG/214574-1116506074750/20542263/FINALAckerman.pdf.

Mark Schacter, When Accountability Fails: A Framework for Diagnosis and Action, Institute On Governance, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2000, www.kms1.isn.ethz.ch/.../policybrief9.pdf.

Randall Peerenboom, Judicial Independecy in China Common Myths and Unfounded Assumption, http://www.fljs.org/uploads/documents/Judicial%20Independence%20in%20China.pdf, hlm. 83

UUD 1945

UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

UU No. 14 Tahun 1985 sebagaimana diubah dengan UU No. 5 Tahun 2004 dan UU No. 3 Tahun 2009.

UU No. 24 Tahun 2003 sebagaimana diubah dengan UU No. 8 Tahun 2011

Putusan Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006 tentang Pengujian Undang- undang No. 22 tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial dan Undang- Undang No. 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 48/PUU-XI/2011 dan Nomor 49/PUU-XI/2011 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi,

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 09/PMK/2006 tentang Pemberlakuan Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi

Keputusan Ketua MA NO. KMA/104 A/SK/XII/2006 tentang Pedoman Perilaku Hakim

Instruksi Presiden No. 7 Tahun 1999 tentang Pedoman Sistem Akuntabilitas Instansi Pemerintah

The Bangalore Draft Code of Judicial Conduct 2001, adopted by the Judicial Group on Strengthening Judicial Integrity, as revised at the Round Table Meeting of Chief Justices held at the Peace Palace, The Hague, November 25-26, 2002,




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 337 times
PDF view : 337 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.