Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1914Keywords:
Judicial Activism, Keadilan Substantif, Kegaduhan Politik, Presidential Threshold, Putusan Mahkamah KonstitusiAbstract
This study aims to explain the application of judicial activism carried out by the Constitutional Court and the reasons for the need for the Constitutional Court to apply judicial activism in the presidential threshold decision through normative juridical research by explaining interrelated principles. The study results show that the Constitutional Court often uses judicial activism as in the Decisions of the Constitutional Court Number 5/PUU-V/2007 and Number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Based on the two decisions, there are at least three considerations of the Constitutional Court in implementing judicial activism that has been fulfilled in cases of presidential threshold, namely, 1) political discrimination, 2) violations of constitutional rights, and 3) a socio-political emergency occurs. Therefore, the Constitutional Court has a basis for testing the threshold that violates morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice. Thus, the Constitutional Court should use judicial activism to give appreciation for substantial justice to revive the value of expediency and justice in society.
References
BUKU
Asshidiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara & Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Budihardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2002.
Hoesein, Zainal Arifin. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Imperium, 2013.
Huda, Ni’matul. Penataan Demokrasi Dan Pemilu Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Manan, Bagir. Menegakkan Hukum Suatu Pencarian. Jakarta: Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia, 2009.
Pamungkas, Sigit. Perihal Pemilu. Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan Fisipol UGM, 2009.
Riwanto, Agus. Desain Sistem Pemerintahan Antikorupsi. Malang: Setara Press, 2018.
Tanya, Bernard L, Yoan N Simanjuntak, and Markus Y Hage. Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2019.
Wiryanto. Etik Hakim Konstitusi: Rekonstruksi Dan Evolusi Sistem Pengawasan. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2019.
JURNAL
Amarini, Indriati. “Implementation of Judicial Activism in Judge’s Decision.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 8, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.21-38.
Barak, Aharon. The Judge in a Democracy. The Judge in a Democracy, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-2338.
Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (August 7, 2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.7.1.20-33.
Cross, Frank B., and Stefanie A. Lindquist. “The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism.” Minnesota Law Review, 2007.
Dwi Anggono, Bayu. “Perspektif Konstitusi Indonesia Pada Kerjasama Partai Politik Dalam Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 9, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v9i1.3000.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Dimensi Judicial Activism Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1328.
Ghoffar, Abdul. “Problematika Presidential Threshold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengalaman Di Negara Lain.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1532.
Gustomy, Rachmad. “Pandemi Ke Infodemi: Polarisasi Politik Dalam Wacana Covid-19 Pengguna Twitter.” JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 5, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v5i2.8781.
Kmiec, Keenan D. “The Origin and Current Meanings of ‘Judicial Activism.’” California Law Review, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481421.
Lestari, Yeni Sri. “Politik Identitas Di Indonesia: Antara Nasionalisme Dan Agama.” Journal of Politics and Policy 1, no. 1 (2018).
Rodríguez-Garavito, César. “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review, 2011.
Wibisana, Andri Gunawan. “Menulis Di Jurnal Hukum: Gagasan, Struktur, Dan Gaya.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 49, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2014.
Young, Ernest A. “Judicial Activism and Conservative Politics.” University of Colorado Law Review, 2002.
INTERNET
Mukhtar, Umar. “Jimly: Sebaiknya Ambang Batas Presiden 20 Persen Dihapus,” April 9, 2021. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/19/04/22/pqd2by377-jimly-sebaiknya-ambang-batas-presiden-20-persen-dihapus.
Widhana, Dieqy Hasbi. “Pilpres 2019: Aksi Walk Out, Bentrok, Hingga Cekcok Berujung Maut,” April 8, 2021. https://tirto.id/pilpres-2019-aksi-walk-out-bentrok-hingga-cekcok-berujung-maut-dmap.
PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (1945).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesejahteraan Sosial, Pub. L. No. 11 (2009).
PUTUSAN-PUTUSAN
Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan MK No. 102/PUU-VII/2009, Mahkamah Konstitusi 1–21 (2009).
———. Putusan MK No. 5/PUU-V/2007 (2007).
———. Putusan MK No. 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008 (2008).
———. Putusan MK No. 53/PUU-XV/2017 (2017).
———. Putusan MK No. 74/PUU-XVIII/2020 (2020).
Asshidiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara & Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Budihardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2002.
Hoesein, Zainal Arifin. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Imperium, 2013.
Huda, Ni’matul. Penataan Demokrasi Dan Pemilu Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Manan, Bagir. Menegakkan Hukum Suatu Pencarian. Jakarta: Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia, 2009.
Pamungkas, Sigit. Perihal Pemilu. Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan Fisipol UGM, 2009.
Riwanto, Agus. Desain Sistem Pemerintahan Antikorupsi. Malang: Setara Press, 2018.
Tanya, Bernard L, Yoan N Simanjuntak, and Markus Y Hage. Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2019.
Wiryanto. Etik Hakim Konstitusi: Rekonstruksi Dan Evolusi Sistem Pengawasan. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2019.
JURNAL
Amarini, Indriati. “Implementation of Judicial Activism in Judge’s Decision.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 8, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.21-38.
Barak, Aharon. The Judge in a Democracy. The Judge in a Democracy, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-2338.
Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (August 7, 2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.7.1.20-33.
Cross, Frank B., and Stefanie A. Lindquist. “The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism.” Minnesota Law Review, 2007.
Dwi Anggono, Bayu. “Perspektif Konstitusi Indonesia Pada Kerjasama Partai Politik Dalam Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 9, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v9i1.3000.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Dimensi Judicial Activism Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1328.
Ghoffar, Abdul. “Problematika Presidential Threshold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengalaman Di Negara Lain.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1532.
Gustomy, Rachmad. “Pandemi Ke Infodemi: Polarisasi Politik Dalam Wacana Covid-19 Pengguna Twitter.” JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 5, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v5i2.8781.
Kmiec, Keenan D. “The Origin and Current Meanings of ‘Judicial Activism.’” California Law Review, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481421.
Lestari, Yeni Sri. “Politik Identitas Di Indonesia: Antara Nasionalisme Dan Agama.” Journal of Politics and Policy 1, no. 1 (2018).
Rodríguez-Garavito, César. “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review, 2011.
Wibisana, Andri Gunawan. “Menulis Di Jurnal Hukum: Gagasan, Struktur, Dan Gaya.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 49, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2014.
Young, Ernest A. “Judicial Activism and Conservative Politics.” University of Colorado Law Review, 2002.
INTERNET
Mukhtar, Umar. “Jimly: Sebaiknya Ambang Batas Presiden 20 Persen Dihapus,” April 9, 2021. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/19/04/22/pqd2by377-jimly-sebaiknya-ambang-batas-presiden-20-persen-dihapus.
Widhana, Dieqy Hasbi. “Pilpres 2019: Aksi Walk Out, Bentrok, Hingga Cekcok Berujung Maut,” April 8, 2021. https://tirto.id/pilpres-2019-aksi-walk-out-bentrok-hingga-cekcok-berujung-maut-dmap.
PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (1945).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesejahteraan Sosial, Pub. L. No. 11 (2009).
PUTUSAN-PUTUSAN
Mahkamah Konstitusi. Putusan MK No. 102/PUU-VII/2009, Mahkamah Konstitusi 1–21 (2009).
———. Putusan MK No. 5/PUU-V/2007 (2007).
———. Putusan MK No. 51-52-59/PUU-VI/2008 (2008).
———. Putusan MK No. 53/PUU-XV/2017 (2017).
———. Putusan MK No. 74/PUU-XVIII/2020 (2020).
Downloads
Published
2022-03-28
How to Cite
Prabowo, Bagus Surya. 2022. “Menggagas Judicial Activism Dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold Di Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 19 (1):073-096. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1914.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
