The Constitutionality of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law: Towards Overcoming SARA Conflict on Social Media


  • Gazalba Saleh University of Narotama, Surabaya



Legal Enforcement, Electronic Transaction, Law of Information


The subsistence of the Electronic Transaction and Information Law control and manage the illicit offenses related to the multiplication of concerns that hold Ethnicity, Religion, Race, and Intergroup (SARA) . Following the idea of law developed by practicality as a way of social regeneration. It is a legal normative investigation utilizing theoretical concurrence and laws. This research is a logical description by using qualitative information examination. The study revealed that content that contains SARA issues is referred to as a hatred statement, which can be construed as an act of communication, carried out by groups or individuals in the form of aggravation and endangered to throw the scandalous actor to prison for utmost six years and a fine of rupiahs. Additionally, the accomplishment of the permissible authority of the Electronic Transaction and Information Law can be classified as non-implementation of the law authenticity establishment as shown from the culture that was not able to go after the rules made by law. It means that this law did not yet have a legal effect. This investigation advocates that society needs to behave by following the officially permitted rules, explained in the Electronic Transaction and Information Law.


Ahmad Tholabi Kharlie, Fathudin, Muhammad Ishar Helmi. (2019). The Role of the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions in Overcoming Challenges of Democracy in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28 (20), pp. 1178-1184.
Anam, M. C., & Hafiz, M. (2015). Surat Edaran Kapolri Tentang Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) dalam Kerangka Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 1(3), 341–364.
Aufderheide, P., & Firestone, W. 1993. Media Literacy: A Report of the National Leadership
Bowman, C. (2017). Data Localisation Laws: An Emerging Global Trend. Jurist. Retrieved from in The Digital Age Elsevier. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 236(5).
Burkhardt, B. (2018). PRC: Data Protection & Localisation, Cyber Security Law, VPN and Encryption Citron, D. K., & Norton, H. (2011). Intermediaries and hate speech: Fostering digital citizenship for our information age. Boston University Law Review. Conference on Media Literacy. Queenstow, MD.
Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., Macy, M., & Weber, I. (2017). Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2017.
Dentons. (2020). 2019 PRC Data Protection & Cybersecurity Annual Report detection in Indonesian social media. Proc. Comp. Sci. 135, 222–229.
Durham, W. Cole and Brett G. Scharffs, Law and Religion: National, International, and Comparative Perspective. New York: Aspen Publisher, 2010
Friedman, L, M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Ghanea, Nazila, “Intersectionality and the Spectrum of Racist Hate Speech: Proposals to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination”, dalam Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 35, Number 4, November 2013
Hernoko, A.Y. and Ghansam, A. (2017). The Application of Circumstance Abuse Doctrine (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) on Judicial Practice in Indonesia’. Vol. 8 No. 7 Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics.
Hoot-Suite. (2017). Facebook; Ten-cent. Vkontance, Live-internet RU
Hoot-Suite. (2017). Internet World Stats; International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Internet Live Stats, CIA World Factbook. Facebook, National Regulatory Authorities.
ICLG. (2020). PRC: Cybersecurity Laws and Regulations 2020 Indonesian legal perspective. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 175(1).
Idayanti, S., Sulistiyono, A., Pujiyono, Novianto, W. T., & Ardyanto, T. (2020). The concept of human rights protecting patients’ rights in obtaining health services. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, (6), 381–393.
Jurriëns, E., & Tapsell, R. (Eds.). (2017). Digital Indonesia: connectivity and divergence. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group
Media Manipulation 2.0: The Impact of Social Media on News, Competition, and Accuracy By Neill Fitzpatrick, Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications Vol. 4, No. 1 January 2018
MMller, K., & Schwarz, C. (2017). Fanning the Flames of Hate: Social Media and Hate Crime. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Mondal, M., Silva, L. A., & Benevenuto, F. (2017). A measurement study of hate speech in social media. HT 2017 - Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media.
Nasional, D. P. (2008). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia pusat bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Nowak, Manfred. (2004) “Permisible Restriction on Freedom of Religion or Belief”, dalam Tore Lindholm,, ed., Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. USA: Martinus Nijhoff Pubslisher
Potter, W. J. (2005). Media Literacy. London: Sage.
Pujiyono, Wiyono, P., & Manthovani, R. (2020). Nationalization as a threat to the economy market in visa and Mastercard business in Indonesia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(1), 159–166.
Puspitasari, L., & Ishii, K. (2016). Digital divides and mobile Internet in Indonesia: Impact of smartphones. Telematics and Informatics. 33(2), 472-483.
Rauf, A. (2016). Internet as a Hope or a Hoax for Emerging Democracies: Revisiting The Concept of Citizenship In The Digital Age. Elsevier. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 236(5).
Schmidt, A., & Wiegand, M. (2017). A Survey on Hate Speech Detection using Natural Language Processing.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2009). Kejahatan & Tindak Pidana Komputer. Jakarta, Pustaka Utama Grafiti..
Soekanto, S. (2008). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sudihar, A., Handayani, G. A. K. R., Pujiyono, & Waluyo. (2019). Public and private law boundaries, nexus of position within a state-owned corporation in Indonesia perspective. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(20), 276–281.
Suhariyanto, B. (2012). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime): Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya. RajaGrafindo Indonesia.
Sunder, P. (2018). A comparative study of the awareness of teachers towards cybercrime, International Journalof Advanced Research and Development. 3(1), pp. 846-848.
Susilo, R. (2019). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana serta komentar-komentarnya lengkap pasal demi pasal.
Wahid, A., & Labib, M. (2005). Kejahatan Mayantara (cyber crime). Refika Aditama.
Yatim, M.A.F., Wardhana, Y., Kamal, A., Soroinda, A.A.R., Rachim, F., Wonggo, M.I. (2017). A corpus-based lexicon building in Indonesian political context through Indonesian online news media. International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, ICACSIS 2016, pp. 347–352.




How to Cite

Saleh, Gazalba. 2022. “The Constitutionality of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law: Towards Overcoming SARA Conflict on Social Media”. Jurnal Konstitusi 18 (4):846-68.