Konstitusionalitas Pelunasan Utang Pajak Perusahaan Pailit Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan
Keywords:Pelunasan Utang Pajak, Perusahaan Pailit, Putusan Pengadilan
The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 41/PUU-XVIII/2020 states that the appointment of the management as a representative of a taxpayer in the form of an entity aims to guarantee certainty that the actions of a legal entity can be held accountable, equivalent to the guarantee of the right of a legal entity to do or not to do something for the sake of the legal entity in question (which incidentally ends up in the interests of the management and shareholders). The management is the main party who is held accountable for the actions/actions of a legal entity because the management operates it in a daily basis. The imposition of responsibilities of a legal entity (which cannot do anything without human assistance) to a person or group of management is not contrary to the 1945 Constitution. Likewise in the case of corporate tax obligations, the provisions that impose the settlement of an entity's tax obligations (debts) bankrupt company tax) to the management of the agency represented by the curator is in accordance with the 1945 Constitution. In accordance to Article 32 paragraph (2) of the KUP Law with the norms of the 1945 Constitution, especially in terms of providing protection and fair legal certainty to all parties interacting with legal entities, including the Applicant who is the administrator of the legal entity, as guaranteed by Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. One form of the rights of the parties that interacts with legal entities is the right of the state to receive payment of taxes from a certain legal entity through a party or person acting as the administrator of the legal entity. This article discusses the constitutionality of paying tax debts to companies that declared bankrupt by a court decision.
Manahan MP Sitompul, 2017, Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Utang Piutang Perusahaan, setara Press, Malang,
Ridwan HR, 2016, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Cetakan ke-12, Rajagrafindo Persada , Jakarta
Rochmat Soemitro dan Dewi Kania Sugiharti, 2004, Asas dan Dasar Perpajakan 1, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1996, Mengenal Hukum suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta
H. Man S. Sastrawidjaya, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, 2006, Bandung
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Hukum Kepailitan, Grafiti, 2002, Jakarta
Siti Anisah, Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. Total Media, Jakarta. 2008.
Putusan MK Nomor 41/PUU-XVIII/2020 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan terhadap UUD 1945, h.184
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.