Urgensi Penemuan Hukum dan Penggunaan Yurisprudensi dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi

Imam Sujono

Abstract


Indonesia is a democratic state based on law (constitutional democratic state), with understanding that Constitution has a position as the supreme law, because the whole administration of the state should be based on the Constitution. The Constitutional Court was present as the guardian of the constitution to realize realization of ideals of Indonesia as a democratic state based on law. The research entitled Rechtsvinding and Jurisprudence Used by the Constitutional Court examines the importance of rechtsvinding and the attachment of using jurisprudence in deciding cases according to the authority possessed by the Constitutional Court. This research uses the Socio Legal method, which is a research method that examines a problem through normative analysis, then uses a non-legal science approach that develops in society. The results of the research that has been done are; 1) penemuan law by the Constitutional Court interpreted as an effort to how the Constitutional Court interpreting the Constitution (1945), testing the laws against the 1945 Constitution, to decide the other cases the authority granted by the 1945 Constitution, 2) The Constitutional Court there is no obligation to be bound and is not there is a prohibition to use the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court and other courts under its environment as well as the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court itself.


Keywords


constitutional court; jurisprudence; rechtsvinding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustine, Oly Viana. “Keberlakuan yurisprudensi pada kewenangan pengujian undang-undang dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 3 (2018): 642-665.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Model-model Pengujian Konstitusional Di Berbagai Negara. 2nd. Jakarta: Konpres, 2005.

—. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Vol. 3. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.

—. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. 5. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.

—. Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2007.

Banakar, Reza, dan Max Travers. “Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research.” Dalam Law, Sociology and Method, disunting oleh Reza Banakar, & Max Travers, 1-26. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2005.

Barnett, Randy E., dan Evan Bernick. “The Letter and the Spirit: A Unified Theory of Originalism.” The Georgetown Law Journal 107 (2018): 1.

Bork, Robert H. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47, no. 1 (1971).

Brest, Paul. “The Misconceive Quest for Original Understanding.” Boston University Law Review 60 (1980): 204.

Cardozo, Benjamin N. The Nature of Judicial Process. Dover Edition. Mineola-New York: Dover Publications, Inc, 2005.

Chemerinsky, Erwin. “Constitutional Interpretation for the Twenty-firtst Century.” Advance, the Journal for the ACS Issue Groups (American Constitution Society for Law and Policy), 2007.

Chemerinsky, Erwin. “The Supreme Court 1988 Term, Forward: The Vanishing Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 103 (1989): 43.

Clinton, Robert Lowry. Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1989.

Ebenstein, William. Great Political Thinkers. Plato to the Present. Third Edition. New York-Chicago-San Francisco-Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.

“Exploring the Constitution Theory of Constitutional Interprestion.” t.thn. https://cstlcla.semo.edu/hhill/ui305/constitutional%20interpretationa.htm.

Garner, Byran A., penyunt. Black’s Law Dictionary. St. Paul Minn: West Group, 1999.

Goldford, Dennis J. The American Constitution and the Debate over Originalism. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Hadjon, Philipus M., dan Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2016.

Hakim, Muhammad. “PERGESERAN ORIENTASI PENELITIAN HUKUM: DARI DOKTRINAL KE SOSIO-LEGAL.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 16, no. 2 (2016): 105-114.

Hamdi, Mirja Fauzul. “KEDUDUKAN YURISPRUDENSI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEREKONSTRUKSI HUKUM ACARA.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2019): 313-324.

Hamilton, Edith. The Roman Way. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc., 1932.

Hausmaninger, H. The Austrian Legal System. Wien: Manzsche Verlags-und Universitätsbuchhandlung, 2003.

Johnston, David. Roman Law in Context. Cambridge-New York-Melbourne-Madrid-Cape Town: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Kay, Richard S. “Original Intention and Public Meaning in Constitutional Interpretation.” Northwestern University Law Review 103 (2009): 703.

Kuswanto, Kuswanto. “Consistency of the Presidential System in Indonesia.” Sriwijaya Law Review, 2018: 170-182.

Merryman, John Henry. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford-California: Stanford University Press, 1985.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, dan A. Pitlo. Bab-bab tentang Penemuan Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.

“Notes on Original Meaning and Its Limits.” Harvard Law Review 120 (2007): 1279.

Palguna, I D.G. Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dasar Pemikiran, Kewenangan, dan Perbandingan dengan Negara Lain,. Jakarta: KonPres, 2018.

—. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint), Upaya Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

—. “Pentingnya Keterbukaan dan Akuntabilitas dalam Mekanisme Judicial Reivew di Mahakamah Agung dan Satu Pertanyaan tentang Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undang di Bawah Undang-Undang.” Mendorong Pengadilan Terbuka dan Akuntabel dalam Mekanisme Judicial Review di Mahkamah Agung. Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan, 2014.

Pontier, J.A. Penemuan Hukum (terjemahan B. Arief Sidharta). Bandung: Laboratorium Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, 2001.

Powell, H. Jefferson. “The Original Understanding of Original Intent.” Harvard Law Review 98 (1985): 885.

Rossum, Ralph A. Antonin Scalia’s Jurisprudence. Text and Tradition. Lawrence, Kansas: Universtity Press of Kansas, 2006.

Ryan, James E. “Laying Claim to the Constitution. The Promise of New Textualism.” Virginia Law Review 97 (2011): 1523.

Sampford, Charles, dan Kim Preston. Interpreting Constitution. Sydney: the Federation Press, 1996.

Scholler, Heinrich. Notes on Constitutional Interpretation. Jakarta: Hans Seidel Foundation, 2004.

Secondat, Charles de, dan Baron de Montesquie. The Spirit of Laws. Dialihbahasakan oleh Thomas Nugent. Kitchener-Ontario (Canada): Batoche Books, 2001.

Solum, Lawrence B. What is Originalism? The Evolution of Contemporary Originalist Theory. Georgetown University Law Center, 2011.

Subiyanto, A E. Yurisprudensi dalam Putusan MK. 06 May 2015. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=10837.

Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law. History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Whittington, Keith E. Constitutional Interpretation. Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1999.

Wood, Linda Picard (Ed.). Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law. Springfield-Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster Inc., 1996.

Zanibar, Zen Zen. “The Indonesian Constitutional System in the Post Amendement of the 1945 Constitution.” Sriwijaya Law Review 2, no. 1 (2018): 45-55.

Zweigert, K., dan H. Kötz. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Dialihbahasakan oleh Tony Weir. Oxford-New York: Third Revised Edition, Clarendon Press, 1998.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1835

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 741 times
PDF view : 186 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.