Desain Badan Peradilan Khusus Pemilihan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk17310Keywords:
Design, Special Election Judicial Body, MK DecisionAbstract
The Constitutional Court Decision Number 97 / PUU-XI / 2013 is a constitutional affirmation of the Court to relinquish its authority to resolve disputes over the results of regional head and deputy regional head elections. Given that conceptually the elections for regional heads and deputy regional heads are not included in the general election regime. After the decision of the Constitutional Court was issued Law Number 1 of 2015 as amended several times, most recently by Law Number 6 of 2020 which explicitly regulates and mandates the establishment of a special judicial body to handle disputes over election results. Neither the Constitutional Court decisions nor the Laws explain in detail the design of a special court that deals with disputes over election results. Therefore, this paper intends to answer research questions about; first, if the Constitutional Court has put the authority to resolve the election result dispute, what is the direction of the Constitutional Court’s thought in designing the settlement of the election result dispute based on decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013? Second, the Constitutional Court Decision has been enumerated into the Election Law, is it in line with the Constitutional Court’s thoughts in the decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 with the normalization in the Election Law regarding disputes over results? third, how is the design of a special judicial body in line with the decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 and the Election Law? The research method used in this research is normative research with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach, with sources of literature law and prescriptive analysis techniques. The findings of this study are; First, the Decidendi Ratio of the Constitutional Court decision Number 97/ PUU-XI/2013 seems to implicitly place the authority to resolve disputes over the results of the elections as part of the authority of the Supreme Court. Second, the normalization of the Pilkada Law related to the settlement of election result disputes is in line with the Constitutional Court’s decision. Third, the design of a special electoral judiciary body is formed under the Supreme Court.
References
Buku
Kordela M, 2008, ‘The Principle of Legal Certainty as a Fundamental
Element of the Formal Concept of the Rule of Law’, Revue Du Notariat.
Lloyd, Lord and Freman, M.D.A, 1979 Lloyd's introduction of Jurispdence, London: Steven & Son.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2005, Penelitian Hukum : Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Kencana.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 1993, Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Bandung :Citra Aditya Bakti.
Siahaan, Maruar, 2012, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Edisi Ke Dua, Jakarta : Sinar Garfika.
Shidarta, 2013, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum, Yogyakarta : Genta Publishing.
Soekanto, Soerjono, 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : UI Press.
Surbakti, Ramlan dkk, 2011, Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu, Jakarta : Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan, 2010, Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana.
Zijlstra, 2009, Bestuurlijk Organisatierecht, Kluwer, Amsterdam : VU University Amsterdam Centre for Law and Governance.
Jurnal dan Tesis
Ayuni, Qurrata, 2018, “Gagasan Pengadilan Khusus Untuk Sengketa Hasil Pemilhan Kepala Daerah”. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48 No. 1: 199-221.
Julyano, Mario dan Yuli Sulistyawan, Aditya, 2019, “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum”. JURNAL CREPIDO, Volume 01, Nomor 01.
Laksono Soeroso, Fajar, 2013, “Pembangkangan” Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 6 No. 3 Desember : 227 – 249.
Laksono, Fadjar, Wijayanti, Winda, et.al, 2013 “Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 tentang SBI atau RSBI”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 4.
M. Nggilu, Novendri, 2019, “Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16, Nomor 1.
Nazriyah, R, 2015, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 12, Nomor 3.
Soeroso, Fadjar Laksono, 2013, “Pembangkangan terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 6.
Suhartono, Slamet, 2015, “Konstitusionalitas Badan Peradilan Khusus dan MK dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pilkada Langsung. Jurnal Konstitusi”, Volume 12, Nomor 3.
Zoelva, Hamdan, 2013, “Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 3.
Satria Buana, Mirza, 2010, Hubungan Tarik Menarik Antara Asas Kepastian Hukum (Legal Certainpi) Dengan Asas Keadilan(Substantial Justice) Dalam Putusan-Putusan Mahkamah Konstltusi, Yogyakarta: Tesis Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Supriyadi, 2018, Dinamika Kewenangan Bawaslu: Telaah terhadap sanksi administrasi pembatalan pasangan calon Kepala daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah. Tesis.
Kordela M, 2008, ‘The Principle of Legal Certainty as a Fundamental
Element of the Formal Concept of the Rule of Law’, Revue Du Notariat.
Lloyd, Lord and Freman, M.D.A, 1979 Lloyd's introduction of Jurispdence, London: Steven & Son.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2005, Penelitian Hukum : Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Kencana.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 1993, Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Bandung :Citra Aditya Bakti.
Siahaan, Maruar, 2012, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Edisi Ke Dua, Jakarta : Sinar Garfika.
Shidarta, 2013, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum, Yogyakarta : Genta Publishing.
Soekanto, Soerjono, 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : UI Press.
Surbakti, Ramlan dkk, 2011, Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu, Jakarta : Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan, 2010, Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana.
Zijlstra, 2009, Bestuurlijk Organisatierecht, Kluwer, Amsterdam : VU University Amsterdam Centre for Law and Governance.
Jurnal dan Tesis
Ayuni, Qurrata, 2018, “Gagasan Pengadilan Khusus Untuk Sengketa Hasil Pemilhan Kepala Daerah”. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48 No. 1: 199-221.
Julyano, Mario dan Yuli Sulistyawan, Aditya, 2019, “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum”. JURNAL CREPIDO, Volume 01, Nomor 01.
Laksono Soeroso, Fajar, 2013, “Pembangkangan” Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 6 No. 3 Desember : 227 – 249.
Laksono, Fadjar, Wijayanti, Winda, et.al, 2013 “Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 tentang SBI atau RSBI”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 4.
M. Nggilu, Novendri, 2019, “Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 16, Nomor 1.
Nazriyah, R, 2015, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 12, Nomor 3.
Soeroso, Fadjar Laksono, 2013, “Pembangkangan terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 6.
Suhartono, Slamet, 2015, “Konstitusionalitas Badan Peradilan Khusus dan MK dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pilkada Langsung. Jurnal Konstitusi”, Volume 12, Nomor 3.
Zoelva, Hamdan, 2013, “Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 3.
Satria Buana, Mirza, 2010, Hubungan Tarik Menarik Antara Asas Kepastian Hukum (Legal Certainpi) Dengan Asas Keadilan(Substantial Justice) Dalam Putusan-Putusan Mahkamah Konstltusi, Yogyakarta: Tesis Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Supriyadi, 2018, Dinamika Kewenangan Bawaslu: Telaah terhadap sanksi administrasi pembatalan pasangan calon Kepala daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah. Tesis.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
2020-11-10
How to Cite
Supriyadi, Supriyadi, and Aminuddin Kasim. 2020. “Desain Badan Peradilan Khusus Pemilihan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97 PUU-XI 2013”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (3):676-98. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk17310.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
