Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

Suwarno Abadi

Abstract


Ultra petita decision practiced under the MK’s jurisdiction to review the constitutionality of legislation needs to be assessed carefully. This practice should not be condemned as illegitimate because there is no explicit constitutional rule that guarantee it. The author therefore argues that this practice can be justified under two reasons. First, judicial activism. Second, the very nature of constitutional adjudication in order to defend the supremacy of the constitution over legislation. According to these reasons, the MK’s ultra petita decision should be upheld because this practice is the most reasonable means to protect the constitution.

Keywords


Ultra Petita Decision, Justifications

References


Altman, Andrew, 2001,Arguing about Law, Belmont-California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

Barak, Aharon, 2006,T he Judge in a Democracy, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Edlin, Douglas E., 2010,Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review,Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Green, Craig, 2009, “An Intellectual History of Judicial activism,” Emory Law Journal, Vol. 58.

Hamburger, Philip, 2008,Law and Judicial Duty,Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 2009,The Common Law, Cambridge-Massachusetts:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Karlan, Pamela, 2007, “Judicial Independences,” Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 95.

Leiter, Brian, 2010, “American Legal Realism,” dalam Dennis Patterson,ed., A Companion toPhilosophy of Law and Legal Theory,Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Marmor,Andrei, 2005, Interpretation and Legal Theory, Oxford and Portland-Oregon: Hart Publishing.

Marshall, The Honorable Margaret H., 2004, “’Wise Parents Do Not Hesitate to Learn from Their Children’: Interpreting State Constitutions in an Age of Global Jurisprudence,” New York University Law Review, Vol. 79.

McCoubrey, Hilaire, dan Nigel D. White, 1997,Textbook on Jurisprudence, London: Blackstone Press Ltd.

Postema, Gerald J., 2011,Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: TheCommon Law World (A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Volume 11), Dordrecht: Springer.

Rawls, John, 1999, A Theory of Justice,Cambridge-Massachussets: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Stone, Geoffrey R., 2012, “Citizens United and Conservative Judicial activism,” Illinois Law Review, 2012.

_____, 2012, “When Is Judicial activism Appropriate?” The Chicago Tribune, 13 April.

Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010,Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta:Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Wheare,K.C., 1975,Modern Constitutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilk, Kurt, 1950,The Legal Philosophy of Lask, Radbruch and Dabin,Cambridge- Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1238

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 363 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) view : 401 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.