Konstitusionalitas Badan Peradilan Khusus dan MK dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pilkada Langsung

Slamet Suhartono

Abstract


In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results.


Keywords


Direct Election; Authority; Constitutional Court; Specialized Judiciary

References


Astawa, I Gde Panca. 2000. Hak Angket dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Menurut UUD 1945. Bandung: Disertasi Doktor PPS Universitas Padjajaran.

Black, Hanry Campbell. 1979. Black Law Dictionary. USA: ST. Paul Mint. West Pu-blishing Co.

Budiarjo, Miriam. 1990. Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Dimensi Global. Jakarta: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, No. 10.

Ekatjahyana, Widodo. 2009. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Gubernur Jawa Timur Putaran Kedua Tahun 2008 dan Implikasi Hukumnya. Jambi: Jurnal Konstitusi, PSKP-FH Universitas Jambi, Vol. II No. 1.

Gie, The Liang. 1967. Pertumbuhan Pemerintahan Daerah di Negara Republik Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Hadjon. Sistem Pembagian Kekuasaan Negara (Analisis Hukum Tata Negara). Surabaya: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.

Nugroho, Agus Wijayanto. 2009. Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sengketa Pemilu Legislatif (Sebuah Pembelajaran Dalam Mewujudkan dan Menjaga Kedaulatan Rakyat). Banjarmasin: Jurnal Konstitusi, PKK-FH, Lambung Mangkurat, Vol. II No. 1.

Reba, Yusak Elisa Reba. 2009. Kompetensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah. Papua: Jurnal Konstitusi, PSK-FH, Uncen, Vol. 1 No. 1.

Said, M. Mas’ud Said. 2005. Arah Baru Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Malang: UMM Press.

Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman. 2000. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Perselisihan Hasil Penghitungan Suara Pemilihan Umum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003. Bengkulu: Jurnal Konstitusi, PKK-FH, Universitas Bengkulu, Vol. II No.1.

Thaib, Dahlan. 1993. Implementasi Sistem Ketatanegaraan Menurut UUD 1945. Yogyakarta: Liberty.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1234

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 215 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) view : 211 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.