Refraksi dan Alinasi Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi

Mira Fajriyah

Abstract


The Justice appointment of The Constitutional Court is an entry point of the independence and impartiality of The Constitutional Court in Indonesia. There is some refraction on the mechanism of the Justice appointment of The Constitutional Court either in the juridical case also in the socio-juridical case. In the juridical  case, there is a substantive regulation flaw as be found in UUD N RI 1945, UU KK dan UU MK. In the socio-juridical case, there is three discourse points to change the mechanism of the Justice appointment of The Constitutional Court. Those discourse points consist of the context of requirement, the ultimate right enforcement of DPR, Presiden and Mahkamah Agung in the Justice appointment of The Constitutional Court which dealing the democratic principle, and the last is about the ideal composition of The Constitutional Court’s Justice based on their political background. Those juridical and socio-juridical cases have to guiding back to the characteristic of The Constitutional Court which will produce the alignment of The Justice appointment of The Constitutional Court. The concept is a juridical alignment that changing the regulation of mechanism of the Justice appointment of The Constitutional Court to fulfill the law hierarchy system and also to accommodate the socio-juridical case substantively and democratically.


Keywords


The Justice Appointment, Juridical Refraction, Constitutional Court

References


Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Jilid 2, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal MK RI.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta: KonPress.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2009, Komentar Atas UUD N RI 1945, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2011, “Pokok Pikiran Tentang Penyempurnaan”, http:// www.jimly.com/makalah/namafile/65/POKOK_PIKIRAN_TENTANG_ PENYEMPURNAAN_SISTEM.pdf, diunduh pada 4 Maret 2015.

John Pieris, 2007, Pembatasan Konstitusional Kekuasaan Presiden RI, Jakarta: Pelangi Cendekia.

Masnur Marzuki, 2014, “Politik Hukum Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi”, http:// hukum.kompasiana.com/2014/04/06/politik-hukum-pengangkatan hakim- mk-644926.html, diakses pada 2 Juli 2014.

Miriam Budiardjo, 2003, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Moh. Fajrul Falaakh, 2013, “Perppu Kegentingan MK”, http://nasional.kompas. com/read/2013/10/09/1050000/Perppu.Kegentingan.MK, diakses tanggal 25 Februari 2015.

Moh. Mahfud MD, 2010, Konstitusi dan hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, Jakarta:

rajagrafindo Persada.

Ni’matul Huda, 2013, “Problematika Substantif Perppu No. 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 10, Nomor 4, Desember 2013, h. 558.

Radian Salman, 2009, “Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Politik Hukum di Bidang Pemilihan Umum”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 2, Nomor 1, Juni, h. 82.

Tim Penyusun Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI.

Tim Penyusun, 2010, Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan UUD N RI 1945 Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002, Buku VI : Kekuasaan Kehakimrtan. Jakarta : Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI.

Tim Redaksi Hukum Online, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/ lt52b81a5964ab6/ptun-batalkan-keppres-pengBeritaangkatan-hakim-mk, diakses pada 2 Februari 2014.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1223

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 208 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) view : 148 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.