Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu Sebagai Bentuk Judicialization 0f Politics

Authors

  • Abdurrachman Satrio Padjadjaran Law Research and Debate Society Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung Jalan Dipati Ukur No.35 Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1217

Keywords:

Judicialization of politics, Electoral Result Dispute, Politicking, Judicial Restraint

Abstract

Judicialization of politics are the phenomenon which usually happen in a democratic constitutional state, which cause power movement to resolve problems which related to public policy making and political nature, from the political institution to judicial institution. In Indonesia this phenomenon arise in the authority of the Constitutional Court, especially in the authority of the Constitutional Court when they adjudicate electoral result dispute, whichs so far, most widely submitted cases to the Constitutional Court. But, as a independent and impartial judicial institution the Constitutional Court must restrict to adjudicate the political cases such as electoral result dispute so that this institution would not be politicking object of another branch of government, however judicialization of politics phenomenon is something that Constitutional Court would not avoid, so that this article will examine how important the Constitutional Court to priority judicial restraint principle in order to adjudicate electoral result dispute, so that Constitutional Court would not be politicking object of another branch of government.

References

Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Essay, No. 78, 1788.
Bagir Manan, ed. 1996, Kedaulatan Rakyat, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Negara Hukum, kumpulan Esai Guna Menghormati Prof. Dr. Sri Soemantri, Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama.
Bisariyadi (et.al), 2012, “Komparasi Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu di Beberapa Negara Penganut Paham Demokrasi Konstitusional”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 9, Nomor 3, September.
International IDEA, Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook, Stockholm: Bull Graphics, 2010, h. 199.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2013, “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara”, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Jonghyun Park, The Judicialization of Politics in Korea, Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 10:1, 2008.
Katherine Glenn Bass and Sujit Choudry, Constitutional Review in New Democracies, http://www.democracy-reporting.org/files/dri-bp-40_en_constitutional_review_in_new_democracies_2013-09.pdf diunduh pada 08 April 2014
Mahfud MD, 2011, “Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi”, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Philip A. Talmadge, 1999, “Understanding the Limits of Power: Judicial Restrain in General Jurisdiction Court Systems”, Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 22:695.
Rahayu Prasetianingsih, 2009, “Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum (PHPU) di Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Upaya Hukum Terakhir dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilihan Umum”, Jurnal Konstitusi Volume I, Nomor 1, November.
Ran Hirschl, 2006, “The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide”, Fordham Law Review Vol. 75.
Russel A. Miller, 2004, “Lords of Democracy: The Judicialization of “Pure Politics” in the United States and Germany, Washington & Lee Law Review”, Vol. 587, h. 599.
Jonghyun Park, 2008, The Judicialization of Politics in Korea, Asian-Paci/ic Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 10:1.
Sidik Pramono (eds.), 2011, “Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu”, Jakarta: Kemitraan Bagi Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintahan di Indonesia.
Sri Soemantri, 1993, “Tentang Lembaga-Lembaga Negara Menurut UUD 1945”,Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Tom Ginsburg, 2002, “Constitutional Courts in New Democracies: Understanding Variation in East Asia”, Global Jurist Advance, Vol. 2, Issue 1.
Veri Junaidi and Jim Della-Giacoma, Clock Watching and Election Complaint in Indonesia Constitutional Court,http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2014/05/20/ clock-watching-and-election-complaints-in-indonesias-constitutional-court/ diunduh 25 Oktober 2014.
Wicaksana Dramanda, Political Judicialization dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia, http://pleads.fh.unpad.ac.id/?p=152, diunduh 16 November 2014.

Published

2016-05-20

How to Cite

Satrio, Abdurrachman. 2016. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Pemilu Sebagai Bentuk Judicialization 0f Politics”. Jurnal Konstitusi 12 (1):117-33. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1217.

Issue

Section

Articles