Legal Reasoning Pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Perbandingan)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1216Keywords:
nebis in idem, legal reasoning, judicial reviewAbstract
Article 24 C of Third Amendment of Constitution Law 1945 is the basis of the Constitutional Court to give the final and binding decision in terms of law examination against Constitution Law 1945. Constitutional Court has a restriction to not examine the nebis in idem case unless there is a different substance of Constitutional Law 1945 which is used as the based of examination. In this paper, there are 12 (twelve) Constitutional Court’s decisions on law re-examination against the Constitutional Law 1945 because using different substance of Constitutional Law 1945 as the based of examination. Based on the research, which has been conducted, there are legal reasoning differences in accepting and deciding the cases which have been decided previously which the Court uses different legal interpretation and construction in deciding the case. Thus, this paper will examine and compare legal reasoning methods which are used in deciding the case.
References
Ahmad Rifai, 2010, “Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif”, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Bambang Sutiyoso, 2006, “Metode Penemuan Hukum: Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan”, Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Bernard Arief Sidharta, 2009, “Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Penelitian tentang Fundasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia”, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Charles Grove Haines, 1944, “The Role of The Supreme Court in American Government and Politics 1789-1835”, London: Cambridge University Press.
Johnny Ibrahim, 2007, “Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif”, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Patrick Nerhot, 1991, “Legal Knowledge and Analogy, Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics”, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Peter de Cruz, 1999, “Comparative Law in A Changing World”, London: Cavendish Publishing.
Philipus M. Hadjon dan Titiek Sri Djatmiati, 2009, “Argumentasi Hukum”, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Ronald Dworkin, 1986, “Law’s Empire”, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2009, “Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar”, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Yudha Bhakti Ardhiwisastra, 2008, “Penafsiran dan Konstruksi Hukum”, Bandung: Alumni.
Bambang Sutiyoso, 2006, “Metode Penemuan Hukum: Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan”, Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Bernard Arief Sidharta, 2009, “Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Penelitian tentang Fundasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia”, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Charles Grove Haines, 1944, “The Role of The Supreme Court in American Government and Politics 1789-1835”, London: Cambridge University Press.
Johnny Ibrahim, 2007, “Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif”, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Patrick Nerhot, 1991, “Legal Knowledge and Analogy, Fragments of Legal Epistemology, Hermeneutics and Linguistics”, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Peter de Cruz, 1999, “Comparative Law in A Changing World”, London: Cavendish Publishing.
Philipus M. Hadjon dan Titiek Sri Djatmiati, 2009, “Argumentasi Hukum”, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Ronald Dworkin, 1986, “Law’s Empire”, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2009, “Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar”, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Yudha Bhakti Ardhiwisastra, 2008, “Penafsiran dan Konstruksi Hukum”, Bandung: Alumni.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Hardjaloka, Loura. 2016. “Legal Reasoning Pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Perbandingan)”. Jurnal Konstitusi 12 (1):94-116. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1216.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
