Eksekusi Barang Rampasan Hasil Tindak Pidana Kehutanan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 021/PUU-III/2005

Eddy Rifai, Rakhmat Triyono

Abstract


This study examines the execution of the judgment against the spoils of crime  in forestry. Research using normative juridical approach and empirical jurisdiction. Execution of judgments against the state spoils of criminal offenses in the field of forestry, the injunction decision declared goods confiscated for the state not to do execution the form of an auction, because of legislation prohibiting the sale of forest products obtained from crime in protected forests. Perspective execution of court decisions to loot the proceeds of crime in the field of forestry is to judge using breakthrough progressive law, the court ruled that the injunction which reads "Evidence confiscated to the state and used for social purposes".

Keywords


Execution; Court Decisions; Forestry Crime

References


Andi Hamzah, 1986,Kamus Hukum, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

-----, 2011, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Elfi Marjuni, 2012, Peran Pengadilan dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Makalah, Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UMY, h. 9.

J.M. van Bemmelen, 1950,Strafvordering, Leerbook van het Ned. Strafprocessrecht. S-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.

Luhut M.P. Pangaribuan, 2009,Lay Judges dan Hakim Ad Hoc. Suatu Studi Teoritis Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

M. Yahya Harahap, 2000, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Musri Nauli, Barang Bukti, Alat Bukti dan Pembuktian. http://www.musri.wordpress.com/, diunduh pada 13 Agustus 2010.

Ratna Nurul Afiah, 1988, Barang Bukti dalam Proses Pidana, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Satjipto Rahardjo, 2008, Hukum Progesif. Jakarta: Penerbit KOMPAS.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1213

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 214 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) view : 144 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.