Dilema dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengenai Kewenangan Memutus Sengketa Pilkada
Keywords:Dualism, Decision, Election Dispute
MK decision to hand back an arbitrary in deciding disputed local election to the MA polemical and disagreement among legal experts. There are those who argue that it was the right decision, and there are also those who argue that the MK decision is wrong. Whatever the views of different opinions, the MK has concluded that it has binding (inkracht) and inviolable. The problem now is how best to anticipate the solution of other legal issues that arise as a result of the MK decision. Thus, in this study the formulation of the issues raised is how the legal effect of the decision of the Constitutional MK No. 1-2/PUU-XII/2014 in the general election in Indonesia. The research method of this law is normative, primary legal materials are UUD NRI of 1945, Act No. 12 of 2008 on Regional Government, Act No. 8 of 2011 on the MK. The approach used in this study is the approach to statutory interpretation and approach. From the research it can be concluded that the MK decision to restore the authority to decide election disputes to the Supreme MA is right, because the local elections are local government regime (local elections). As a result of the decision, the government should establish a local election management bodies on a par with the Commission which may be called the local election commission (KPKD) but only institution based in the provincial and district/city, for an arbitrary level of appeal submitted to the MA.
Albert H.Y. Chen, 2000, The Interpretation of the Basic Law-Common Law and Mainlad Chinese Perspective, Hongkong, Hongkong Journal Ltd.
Anton M. Moeliono, 1995, dkk, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta, Balai Pustaka.
Bagir Manan, Wewenang Provinsi, Kabupaten dan Kota dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerah, Makalah PAda Seminar NAsional Pengembangan Wlayah dan Pengelolaan SDA di Kawasan Pesisir dalam Rangka Penataan Ruang, Bandung, FH Unpad, 13 Mei 2000.
H.D Stout, 1994, De Betekenissen van de wet, W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle.
H.D. Van Wijk, 1984, Hoofdstukken Van Administratief Recht, Vuga, S-Gravenhage.
Indroharto, 1993, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta, Sinar Harapan.
J.A. Pontier, 2008, Penemuan Hukum, diterjemahkan oleh B. Arief Sidharta, Bandung, Jendela Mas Pustaka.
Jawahir Thantowi, Kewenangan Daerah Dalam Melaksanakan hubungan Luar Negeri (Studi di Kasus Provinsi Jawa Barat dan DIY), Jurnal Hukum Volume 2 no. 16, April 2009.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Sumber hukum dan Metode Penafsiran Konstitusi, Makalah, tanpa tahun.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2006, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta.
Richard E. Palmer, 2005, Hermeneutika, Teori Baru Mengenai Interpretasi, (terjemahan Musnur Hery dan Damanhuri Muhammad), Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2006, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1988, Pokok-Pokok sosiologi Hukum, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers. Sudikno Mertokusumo dan A. Pitlo, 1993, Bab-bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.