Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1115Keywords:
Ultra Petita, Rule of Law, Constitutional Court of Indonesia RepublicAbstract
Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict was:(a) philosophical reasons in order to enforce substantive justice and constitutional justice as embodied in the Constitution NRI 1945, (b) theoretical grounds related to the authority of the judge to explore, discover and follow the legal values that live in the community, if the law does not exist or insufficient legal anymore (outdated), and (c) juridical reasons relating to the provision of Article 24 paragraph (1) NRI 1945 Constitution and Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law no. 24 year 2003 on the Constitutional Court, that Court as organizers aim to enforce the judicial justice according to law and the evidence and the judge's conviction. The verdict the Constitutional Court which is ultra petita basically acceptable, all associated to the subject of the request and based on considerations which can be accounted for philosophical (ie, contains the values of justice, morality, ethics, religion, principle, doctrine). The authority to make ultra petita verdict for the Constitutional Court can only be given if there is vagueness of legal norms (vague normen) through the method of interpretation of the law, or if a legal vacuum (rechts-vacuum) through the creation of legal methods (rechtschepping). But considering the legal interpretation and legal formation are highly subjective, hence in order to prevent abuse of power, the Constitutional Court issued a verdict ultra petita, should be limited by the principles of a democratic state of law, the principles of fair trial and impartial, and general principles of good governance.
References
Abdul Mukthie Fadjar, 2010, Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal dan Penafsir Konstitusi: Masalah dan Tantangan, dalam Konstitusionalisme Demokrasi, Malang: in-TRANS Publishing.
Achmad Roestandi, 2012, Etika dan Kesadaran Hukum Internalisasi Hukum dan Eksternalisasi Etika, Cetakan Pertama, Tangerang: Jelajah Nusa.
Arief Hidayat, 2013, “Prinsip Ultra Petita Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Pengujian Undang Undang terhadap Undang Undang Dasar 1945”, Makalah, Disampaikan pada saat fit and propter test di hadapan Komisi III DPR RI, pada tanggal 27 Februari.
Bagir Manan, 1992, Dasar Dasar Perundang-undangan Indonesia, Jakarta: IN-HILL-Co.
Bambang Sunggono dan Aries Harianto, 2001, Bantuan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Esmi Warasih, 2005, Pranata Hukum Sebagai Telaah Sosiologi, Semarang: Suryandaru Utama.
G. Radbruch, “Rechtsphilosophie” , Fuller’s translation of formula in Journal of Legal Education 4th ed. page 353, h. 181.
Jazim Hamidi, 2005, “Makna dan Kedudukan Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustua l945 Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia”, Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Bandung: Universitas Padjdjaran.
-----------------, 2000, Yurisprudensi tentang Penerapan Asas Asas Umum Penyelengaraan Pemerintahan yang Layak, Jakarta: Tata Nusa.
Johnny Ibrahim, 2005, Teori & Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Cetakan Pertama, Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.
Mahfud MD, “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mengawal Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara”, diakses dari http://www.mahfudmd.com/public/makalah/Makalah_21.pdf.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Philipus M Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Bina Ilmu: Surabaya.
Sirajuddin et al., 2006, Legislatif Drafting Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundangan, Malang: Yappika.
Sudarsono, 2001, Ilmu Filsafat suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
R. Wiyono, 2007, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Cet. I, Jakarta:Sinar Grafika Offset.
Achmad Roestandi, 2012, Etika dan Kesadaran Hukum Internalisasi Hukum dan Eksternalisasi Etika, Cetakan Pertama, Tangerang: Jelajah Nusa.
Arief Hidayat, 2013, “Prinsip Ultra Petita Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Pengujian Undang Undang terhadap Undang Undang Dasar 1945”, Makalah, Disampaikan pada saat fit and propter test di hadapan Komisi III DPR RI, pada tanggal 27 Februari.
Bagir Manan, 1992, Dasar Dasar Perundang-undangan Indonesia, Jakarta: IN-HILL-Co.
Bambang Sunggono dan Aries Harianto, 2001, Bantuan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Esmi Warasih, 2005, Pranata Hukum Sebagai Telaah Sosiologi, Semarang: Suryandaru Utama.
G. Radbruch, “Rechtsphilosophie” , Fuller’s translation of formula in Journal of Legal Education 4th ed. page 353, h. 181.
Jazim Hamidi, 2005, “Makna dan Kedudukan Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustua l945 Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia”, Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Bandung: Universitas Padjdjaran.
-----------------, 2000, Yurisprudensi tentang Penerapan Asas Asas Umum Penyelengaraan Pemerintahan yang Layak, Jakarta: Tata Nusa.
Johnny Ibrahim, 2005, Teori & Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Cetakan Pertama, Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.
Mahfud MD, “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mengawal Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara”, diakses dari http://www.mahfudmd.com/public/makalah/Makalah_21.pdf.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Philipus M Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Bina Ilmu: Surabaya.
Sirajuddin et al., 2006, Legislatif Drafting Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundangan, Malang: Yappika.
Sudarsono, 2001, Ilmu Filsafat suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
R. Wiyono, 2007, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Cet. I, Jakarta:Sinar Grafika Offset.
Downloads
Published
2016-05-20
How to Cite
Rubaie, Ach., Nyoman Nurjaya, Moh. Ridwan, and Istislam Istislam. 2016. “Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 11 (1):85-108. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1115.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
