Menimbang Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Setelah Terbitnya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1749Keywords:
Legal Interpretation, Judicial Power, Honorary Council of the Constitutional CourtAbstract
This research elaborates the Constitutional Court interpretation within Decision No. 49/PUU-IX/2011 on judicial review of Law No. 8 of 2011 on amendments of Law No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court which its decision has granted mostly the petitioner’s petitions to change the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court members composition. There are at least two examined issues in this study, they are: Firstly, does the addition of elements House of Representative, Government and the Supreme Court contradict Article 1 paragraph (3) and Article 24 paragraph (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution? And secondly, what is the implication of the decision to repeal Article 27A paragraph (2) letters C, D, and E for check and balance between three branches of state government (executive, legislative and judicial) in Indonesia? This research is normative legal research that uses a conceptual approach, also reviewed with case studies related to material research. The results show; Firstly, based on the study to Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-IX/2011 which accepted most of the petitioner’s petitions on judicial review of Law No. 8 of 2011, the Constitutional Court stated that the addition of elements House of Representative, Government and the Supreme Court as members in the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court then legislators have endangered the freedom of judicial power as regulated Article 1 paragraph (3) and Article 24 paragraph (1) and (2) the 1945 Constitution. Secondly, this decision has an impact on the members of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court which only consists of two elements, namely the constitutional court and the judicial commission. Therefore, the Constitutional Court Decision is considered successful in keeping the principle of check and balance between three branches of state government in the Indonesian constitutional state system.
References
A. Mukti Arto, 2001, Konsepsi Ideal Mahkamah Agung, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, h. 145.
Drs. Hery Susanto (Editor), Tanpa Tahun, Reformasi Peradilan dan Tanggung Jawab Negara, Komisi Yudisial RI, Jakarta, h. 85-86.
Dr. Munir Fuady SH., MH., LL.M., 2009, Teori Negara Hukum Modern, Bandung:PT. Refika Aditama, h. 118-119.
Dr. Muntoha SH., M. Ag, 2009, Negara Hukum, Makalah disampaikan dalam acara workshop “Pendidikan Politik Bagi Pemilih Pemula” PSHK FH UII bekerjasama dengan Hans Seidel Foundation, Yogyakarta, 21 Maret 2009.
Dr. Suparman Marzuki SH. M.Si., Dkk., Tanpa Tahun, Wajah Hakim Dalam Putusan; Studi Atas Putusan Hakim Berdimensi Hak Asasi Manusia, Yogyakarta: PusatmStudi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia, h. 30.
Ikhsan Rosada Parluhutan Daulay SH., 2006, Mahkamah Konstitusi; Memahami Keberadaannya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Repuublik Indonesia, Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta, h. 44-48.
J. Djohansjah, 2010, Independensi Hakim ditengah Benturan Politik dan Kekuasaan,dalam buku Reforamsi Peradilan dan Tanggung Jawab Negara, Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial RI, h. 83.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2008, Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis, Jakarta:Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, h. 415-417.
Ni,matul Huda, , 2007, Lembaga Negara dalam Transisi Demokrasi, Yogyakarta:UII Press, h. 93.
Prof. Dr. Bagirmanan SH., M.C.L., 2005, Sistim Peradilan Berwibawa (Suatu Pencarian), Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, h. 76.
Prof. Dr. Bintan R. Saragih MA. dkk., Tanpa Tahun, Ilmu Negara, (Edisi Revisi),Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, h. 119.
Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie S.H., 2006, Sengketa Kewenangan Antar Lembaga Negara, Jakarta Pusat: Konstitusi Press, h. 106.
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 Tentang Mahkamah Agung.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 49/PUU-IX/2011.
Drs. Hery Susanto (Editor), Tanpa Tahun, Reformasi Peradilan dan Tanggung Jawab Negara, Komisi Yudisial RI, Jakarta, h. 85-86.
Dr. Munir Fuady SH., MH., LL.M., 2009, Teori Negara Hukum Modern, Bandung:PT. Refika Aditama, h. 118-119.
Dr. Muntoha SH., M. Ag, 2009, Negara Hukum, Makalah disampaikan dalam acara workshop “Pendidikan Politik Bagi Pemilih Pemula” PSHK FH UII bekerjasama dengan Hans Seidel Foundation, Yogyakarta, 21 Maret 2009.
Dr. Suparman Marzuki SH. M.Si., Dkk., Tanpa Tahun, Wajah Hakim Dalam Putusan; Studi Atas Putusan Hakim Berdimensi Hak Asasi Manusia, Yogyakarta: PusatmStudi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia, h. 30.
Ikhsan Rosada Parluhutan Daulay SH., 2006, Mahkamah Konstitusi; Memahami Keberadaannya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Repuublik Indonesia, Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta, h. 44-48.
J. Djohansjah, 2010, Independensi Hakim ditengah Benturan Politik dan Kekuasaan,dalam buku Reforamsi Peradilan dan Tanggung Jawab Negara, Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial RI, h. 83.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2008, Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis, Jakarta:Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, h. 415-417.
Ni,matul Huda, , 2007, Lembaga Negara dalam Transisi Demokrasi, Yogyakarta:UII Press, h. 93.
Prof. Dr. Bagirmanan SH., M.C.L., 2005, Sistim Peradilan Berwibawa (Suatu Pencarian), Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, h. 76.
Prof. Dr. Bintan R. Saragih MA. dkk., Tanpa Tahun, Ilmu Negara, (Edisi Revisi),Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, h. 119.
Prof. Dr. Jimly Asshiddiqie S.H., 2006, Sengketa Kewenangan Antar Lembaga Negara, Jakarta Pusat: Konstitusi Press, h. 106.
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 Tentang Mahkamah Agung.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 49/PUU-IX/2011.
Downloads
Published
2021-01-25
How to Cite
Firmantoro, Zuhad Aji. 2021. “Menimbang Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Setelah Terbitnya Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (4):899-918. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1749.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the publisher.
- The publisher of Jurnal Konstitusi is The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
