Kewajiban Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional Teman Tuli dalam Mengakses Informasi di Mahkamah Konstitusi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1747

Keywords:

The deaf, The Constitutional Court, Right to Access Information

Abstract


As one of the judiciary bodies in Indonesia, which plays a role as the human right protector, the Constitutional Court have a significant part to ensure the fulfilment of the Indonesians’ human right. Moreover, before signing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2007 in New York and ratifying it in 2011, Indonesia had recognized human rights under its constitution, namely UUD 1945. Furthermore, the government of Republic Indonesia has been approving Act number 8 the Year 2016 about Persons with Disabilities in 2016. Under this act, the deaf has its recognized rights, especially to access information, to choose the preferable kind communication forms as it needs, and the affirmation of the state’s obligations to fulfil their human rights equally. However, the Constitutional Court has yet to have a standard operating procedure yet which specifically regulates the mechanism of accessible information for the deaf. Accordingly, in disseminating information to the public, not all people can access the information. In other words, the deaf find difficulties to comprehend the content of the message conveyed by the Court to the public as the Court do not consistently provide any tools, such as sign language interpreter and written texts. Thus, it is safe to submit that accessible information is yet to be provided by the Court in terms of publishing the information to the public. This article discusses the obligation of the Constitutional Court to ensure the fulfillment of the deaf right to access information. The aim of elaborating some related cases law and an applied standard operational procedure in Georgia’s Court in this article is that to remind the Constitutional Court to be consistent in ensuring the enjoyment and fulfillment of the deaf right to access information as the constitution recognize equality for all.

References

Access, Fairness, Public Trust and Confidence Committee Judicial Council of Georgia
Administrative Office the Court, “A Handbook for Georgia Court Officials on
Courtroom Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities 2017 edition
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2016, Konstitusi Bernegara Praksis Kenegaraan Bermartabat
dan Demokrasi, Malang: Setara Press
_____________, 2015, Gagasan Konstitusi Sosial Institusionalisasi dan Konstitusionalisasi
Kehidupan Sosial Masyarakat Madani, Jakarta: LP3ES
MaPPI FHUI dan Sapda, 2019, Panduan Penanganan Perkara Penyandang Disabilitas
Berhadapan dengan Hukum Dalam Lingkup Pengadilan.
SIGAP Indonesia, 2019, Analisis Putusan Difabel Berhadapan dengan Hukum, Yogyakarta.
Jurnal
Cekli Setya Pratiwi, “Konsep Dasar dan Instrumen-Instrumen Hak Asasi Manusia
Internasional: Permasalahan Internalisasinya di Indonesia”. SSRN. http://
dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3304096.
Hari Santoso, “Upaya Meningkatkan Minat dan Budaya Membaca Buku Melalui Iklan
Layanan Masyarakat”. http://library.um.ac.id/images/stories/pustakawan/
pdfhasan/iklan%20layanan%20masyarakat.pdf.
Artikel Internet
Access, Fairness, Public Trust and Confidence Committee Judicial Council of
Georgia Administrative Office the Court, “A Handbook for Georgia Court
Officials on Courtroom Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities 2017
edition”, https://georgiacourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ADAJudicial-Handbook-2017_Oct-Update.pdf
DPR, “Deskripsi Konsepsi (DPR) atas RUU Penyandang Disabilitas Tanggal 2 Februari
2015”, http://www.dpr.go.id/prolegnas/deskripsi-konsepsi/id/26
International Bar Association, “Access to Justice for Persons with Disabilities:
From International Principles to Practice”, https://www.ibanet.org/Search/
Search.aspx?query=access%20to%20justice%20for%20persons%20with%20
disabilities, diakses pada 16 September 2019.
MKRI, “Sejarah dan Pembentukan, Kedudukan, serta Kewenangan Mahkamah
Konstitusi”, https://mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=11768
MKRI, “Visi dan Misi Mahkamah Konstitusi”, https://www.mkri.id/index.
php?page=web.ProfilMK&id=2&menu=2
Nurul Khamndiniyati, “Bisindo dan SIBI, Apa Bedanya?”, https://difabel.
id/2019/08/29/perbedaan-bisindo-dan-sibi/
OHCHR, Status of Ratification Interactive Dashboard CRPD, http://indicators.
ohchr.org/.
OHCHR, Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities https://www.ohchr.org/en/
issues/disability/pages/disabilityindex.aspx
Tempo, “Alasan Istilah Tuli Lebih Disarankan Ketimbang Tunarungu”, https://
difabel.tempo.co/read/1101923/alasan-istilah-tuli-lebih-disarankanketimbang-tunarungu/full&view=ok.
United Nations, “The Foundation of International Human Rights Law”, https://
www.un.org/en/sections/universal-declaration/foundation-internationalhuman-rights-law/index.html.
UNESCO, “Delivering Together for Inclusive Development: Digital Access to
Information and Knowledge for Persons with Disabilities”, https://unesdoc.
unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000369088
Duvall v. County of Kitsap, https://www.casemine.com/judgement/
us/5914b969add7b0493478b1c7
The Centre for Internet & Society, “Summary of Judgements on Disability Rights”,
https://cis-india.org/accessibility/blog/summary-of-judgments-on-disabilityrights, diakses pada 17 September 2019.
Updike V. City of Gresham, Defendant, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-9thcircuit/1872804.html

Downloads

Published

2021-01-25

How to Cite

Yustikaningrum, Rima Yuwana. 2021. “Kewajiban Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional Teman Tuli Dalam Mengakses Informasi Di Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi 17 (4):849-78. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1747.

Issue

Section

Articles